Abstract 2202
Background
Chemotherapy-induced temporary hair loss is one of the most common and distressing side-effects of cancer therapy. Scalp cooling is a long known method to reduce chemotherapy-induced alopecia in cancer patients, especially when antracycline or taxanes are used. However scalp cooling to reduce hair loss is still a controversial issue.
Methods
We included 210 breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy both in (neo) adjuvant and palliative setting. Evaluation was focused on the quantification of chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA), satisfaction and side effects of the scalp cooling system. the severity of hair loss was assessed according to CTCAE version 4.0 by the nurses team together with the patient. Nurses completed questionnaires on patients baseline characteristics and type of chemotherapy received during each session of scalp-cooling The following chemotherapeutic treatments were included: doxorubicin alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide (AC); AC followed by paclitaxel,paclitaxel alone; FEC ; FEC followed by docetaxel.
Results
The mean overall success rate of scalp cooling (<50% hair loss) was at 62%. In the final results, major hair loss was avoided in 85% patients given taxane treatment, in 79% of patients given FEC treatment and in 32% of patients given AC treatment. None of these patients needed to use a wig and all of them were satisfied about the results at the final evaluation. 87% of the patients considered the avoidance of hair loss to be important before starting the chemotherapy. 12 patients discontinued scalp cooling for side-effects or low compliance.
Conclusions
Nurse team were properly trained and provided with higher experience; a standardized approach was used by the nurse staff for each patient with dedicated time. Our experience showed that scalp cooler provides a good chance for breast cancer patients to keep their hair during anthracyclines and/or taxane containing (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy and could be integrated into daily practice of chemotherapy unit.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Fabrizio Artioli.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract