Abstract 2202
Background
Chemotherapy-induced temporary hair loss is one of the most common and distressing side-effects of cancer therapy. Scalp cooling is a long known method to reduce chemotherapy-induced alopecia in cancer patients, especially when antracycline or taxanes are used. However scalp cooling to reduce hair loss is still a controversial issue.
Methods
We included 210 breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy both in (neo) adjuvant and palliative setting. Evaluation was focused on the quantification of chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA), satisfaction and side effects of the scalp cooling system. the severity of hair loss was assessed according to CTCAE version 4.0 by the nurses team together with the patient. Nurses completed questionnaires on patients baseline characteristics and type of chemotherapy received during each session of scalp-cooling The following chemotherapeutic treatments were included: doxorubicin alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide (AC); AC followed by paclitaxel,paclitaxel alone; FEC ; FEC followed by docetaxel.
Results
The mean overall success rate of scalp cooling (<50% hair loss) was at 62%. In the final results, major hair loss was avoided in 85% patients given taxane treatment, in 79% of patients given FEC treatment and in 32% of patients given AC treatment. None of these patients needed to use a wig and all of them were satisfied about the results at the final evaluation. 87% of the patients considered the avoidance of hair loss to be important before starting the chemotherapy. 12 patients discontinued scalp cooling for side-effects or low compliance.
Conclusions
Nurse team were properly trained and provided with higher experience; a standardized approach was used by the nurse staff for each patient with dedicated time. Our experience showed that scalp cooler provides a good chance for breast cancer patients to keep their hair during anthracyclines and/or taxane containing (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy and could be integrated into daily practice of chemotherapy unit.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Fabrizio Artioli.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2108 - Biomarker analyses of ramucirumab in patients with platinum refractory urothelial cancer from RANGE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3090 - Comparison of Immuno-Oncology (IO) Biomarkers in Adenocarcinoma (ACB), Urothelial Carcinoma (UCB) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCCB) of the Bladder, with interim results from PURE01
Presenter: Daniele Raggi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5211 - Potential role of a clinical, taxonomical classification and RNA expression integrated signature to predict response to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients
Presenter: Albert Font
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3206 - Hyperphosphatemia due to Erdafitinib (a Pan-FGFR Inhibitor) and Anti-tumor Activity Among Patients (Pts) with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Scott Tagawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3110 - Prognostic role of FGFR Mutations and FGFR mRNA expression in metastatic urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD(L1) inhibitors in first and second line setting
Presenter: Florian Roghmann
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3564 - Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean-Michel Lavoie
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2760 - Comparative analysis of tumor mutational burden (TMB) prediction methods and its association with determinants of the tumor immune microenvironment of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC)
Presenter: Markus Eckstein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2513 - The Immunoscore in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical significance for pathological response and survival
Presenter: Elise Nassif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2835 - Genomic analysis of urothelial cancer and associations with treatment choice and outcome
Presenter: David Sarid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5763 - cfDNA is an acceptable but insufficient means of characterizing FGFR3 mutation in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)
Presenter: Sumanta Pal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract