Abstract 2202
Background
Chemotherapy-induced temporary hair loss is one of the most common and distressing side-effects of cancer therapy. Scalp cooling is a long known method to reduce chemotherapy-induced alopecia in cancer patients, especially when antracycline or taxanes are used. However scalp cooling to reduce hair loss is still a controversial issue.
Methods
We included 210 breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy both in (neo) adjuvant and palliative setting. Evaluation was focused on the quantification of chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA), satisfaction and side effects of the scalp cooling system. the severity of hair loss was assessed according to CTCAE version 4.0 by the nurses team together with the patient. Nurses completed questionnaires on patients baseline characteristics and type of chemotherapy received during each session of scalp-cooling The following chemotherapeutic treatments were included: doxorubicin alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide (AC); AC followed by paclitaxel,paclitaxel alone; FEC ; FEC followed by docetaxel.
Results
The mean overall success rate of scalp cooling (<50% hair loss) was at 62%. In the final results, major hair loss was avoided in 85% patients given taxane treatment, in 79% of patients given FEC treatment and in 32% of patients given AC treatment. None of these patients needed to use a wig and all of them were satisfied about the results at the final evaluation. 87% of the patients considered the avoidance of hair loss to be important before starting the chemotherapy. 12 patients discontinued scalp cooling for side-effects or low compliance.
Conclusions
Nurse team were properly trained and provided with higher experience; a standardized approach was used by the nurse staff for each patient with dedicated time. Our experience showed that scalp cooler provides a good chance for breast cancer patients to keep their hair during anthracyclines and/or taxane containing (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy and could be integrated into daily practice of chemotherapy unit.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Fabrizio Artioli.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract