Abstract 4942
Background
The evaluation of response for brain metastases (BM) may be challenging in the context of treatment by stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) or immunotherapy or both, which represent major therapeutic options for melanoma BM.
Methods
We reviewed clinical and neuroimaging data of 62 melanoma patients with newly diagnosed BM treated by the combination of immunotherapy and SRT (n = 33, group A), immunotherapy alone (n = 10, group B) or SRT alone or in combination with other systemic therapies (BRAF inhibitors, n = 7; alkylating agents, n = 6; no systemic treatment, n = 6), (n = 19, group C). Response was assessed using RECIST 1.1, RANO or iRANO criteria.
Results
BRAF mutations were noted in 26 patients. Until BM diagnosis, a median of 1 (range 1-4) line of systemic treatment was given. At BM diagnosis, median age was 58 years (range 23-85.5). Fifty-four patients (87%) had 1-3 metastases. The median maximum diameter was 18.5 mm (range, 9-49). The median DS-GPA was 3 (1-4). After a median follow-up of 30.5 months for surviving patients, 39 patients have experienced CNS progression, 16 (48.5%) in group A, 9 (90%) in group B, 14 (73.5%) in group C. Median PFS was 129.5 days (range 82-532) in group A, 75 days (range 35-203) in group B, 136 days (range 59-514) in group C. Forty-seven patients (76%) had died at the time of the analysis, 22 (66.5%) in group A, 7 (70%) in group B, 18 (94.5%) in group C. Median OS was 345 days (range 65-1824) in group A, 174.5 days (range 50-1361) in group B, 409 days (range 102-1244) in group C. 52 MRI scans were available for central review: pseudoprogression was documented in 9 patients (29%) in group A, 0 (0%) in group B, and 5 (29.5%) in group C. Response rates were similar with all three sets of response criteria. Progressive disease was less often called when applying iRANO to assess SRT target lesions.
Conclusions
While the retrospective nature and small sample size for subgroups are major limitations of this study, these data may indicate that the omission of SRT from first-line treatment may compromise outcome. Pseudoprogression is uncommon with immunotherapy alone; pseudoprogression rates were similar after SRT alone or in combination with immunotherapy or other systemic treatment.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
University Hospital of Zurich.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5995 - Invasive fungal diseases caused by rare pathogens in patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) & chemotherapy
Presenter: Yuliya Rogacheva
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2961 - Safety and pharmacokinetics of novel CXCR4 antagonist YF-H-2015005 in the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Presenter: Weiping Liu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5771 - Chemotherapy associated Hyponatremia in Hematological Malignancies: A retrospective study of 189 patients treated in a single medical center
Presenter: Vadim Lesan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1165 - Risk factors for Bacteremia-Associated Mortality of Aeromona sobria in Hematologic Malignancies
Presenter: Gabriel De la Cruz-Kú
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5287 - Use of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction for detecting minimal residual disease: a prospective, multi-institutional study
Presenter: Hyunkyung Park
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1886 - RUBIH2 — Use of NGS in haematological malignancies: from real world data to national recommendations, an innovative program to evaluate the impact of healthcare technology on patient care
Presenter: Severine Coquerelle
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1940 - Outcomes of chronic myeloid leukemia with T315I mutation in the absence of targeted therapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Presenter: Nageswara Palukuri
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1946 - Is bone marrow examination indispensible in chronic myeloid Leukemia at diagnosis ?
Presenter: Nageswara Palukuri
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1904 - Incidence of Imatinib Resistance in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients: Experience from Resource Poor Centre of Eastern India
Presenter: Debmalya Bhattacharyya
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3245 - BCR-ABL transcript variant’s significance in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: Institutional experience from a developing country
Presenter: Siva Prasad
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract