Abstract 4942
Background
The evaluation of response for brain metastases (BM) may be challenging in the context of treatment by stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) or immunotherapy or both, which represent major therapeutic options for melanoma BM.
Methods
We reviewed clinical and neuroimaging data of 62 melanoma patients with newly diagnosed BM treated by the combination of immunotherapy and SRT (n = 33, group A), immunotherapy alone (n = 10, group B) or SRT alone or in combination with other systemic therapies (BRAF inhibitors, n = 7; alkylating agents, n = 6; no systemic treatment, n = 6), (n = 19, group C). Response was assessed using RECIST 1.1, RANO or iRANO criteria.
Results
BRAF mutations were noted in 26 patients. Until BM diagnosis, a median of 1 (range 1-4) line of systemic treatment was given. At BM diagnosis, median age was 58 years (range 23-85.5). Fifty-four patients (87%) had 1-3 metastases. The median maximum diameter was 18.5 mm (range, 9-49). The median DS-GPA was 3 (1-4). After a median follow-up of 30.5 months for surviving patients, 39 patients have experienced CNS progression, 16 (48.5%) in group A, 9 (90%) in group B, 14 (73.5%) in group C. Median PFS was 129.5 days (range 82-532) in group A, 75 days (range 35-203) in group B, 136 days (range 59-514) in group C. Forty-seven patients (76%) had died at the time of the analysis, 22 (66.5%) in group A, 7 (70%) in group B, 18 (94.5%) in group C. Median OS was 345 days (range 65-1824) in group A, 174.5 days (range 50-1361) in group B, 409 days (range 102-1244) in group C. 52 MRI scans were available for central review: pseudoprogression was documented in 9 patients (29%) in group A, 0 (0%) in group B, and 5 (29.5%) in group C. Response rates were similar with all three sets of response criteria. Progressive disease was less often called when applying iRANO to assess SRT target lesions.
Conclusions
While the retrospective nature and small sample size for subgroups are major limitations of this study, these data may indicate that the omission of SRT from first-line treatment may compromise outcome. Pseudoprogression is uncommon with immunotherapy alone; pseudoprogression rates were similar after SRT alone or in combination with immunotherapy or other systemic treatment.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
University Hospital of Zurich.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3371 - Pulmonary Resectable Metastases of Osteosarcoma With Apatinib and CHemotherapy (PROACH):A Multi-Center Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial
Presenter: Qiyuan Bao
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1666 - National Clinical-biological Prospective Cohort of Incident Cases of Aggressive Fibromatosis, AF (ALTITUDES)
Presenter: Thomas Ryckewaert
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5531 - Health-related quality Of Life In patients with advanced Soft TIssue sarcomas treated with Chemotherapy: The HOLISTIC study
Presenter: Eugenie Younger
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5568 - Assessing QUality of life and Experiences of diagnostic Trajectories of Sarcoma patients: The QUEST study protocol
Presenter: Vicky Soomers
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract