Abstract 3632
Background
Combination IPI+PD1 immunotherapy has a high initial response rate, but patients can subsequently progress. The best management of this acquired resistance is unknown. We sought to explore the efficacy and safety of rechallenge IPI+PD1 in this setting.
Methods
Retrospective data from four melanoma centres were reviewed. Demographics, disease characteristics, initial and rechallenge treatment efficacy and toxicity were examined.
Results
15 patients (pt) were identified: 60% male, median age 51y, 40% BRAF mutant. 14 pt received IPI+PD1 as 1st line of treatment, 1 received prior BRAFi+MEKi. 9 pt received ipilimumab (I) 3mg/Kg and nivolumab (N) 1mg/kg (I3N1), 5 received I 1mg/kg and pembrolizumab (P) 2mg/kg, 1 patient I 100mg q12w/P200mg q3w, with a median 4 cycles of I. 1 pt had CR, 10 had PR, and 4 prolonged SD (>6 months) to initial treatment. 7 pt (47%) developed significant irAE (4 hepatitis, 2 colitis, 1 pneumonitis), of which 6 (85%) ceased IPI + PD1 and only 1 pt continued PD1 alone. Median time to progression (TTP1) was 11 months (range 5-31 months). After progression, 5 (33%) had no intervening systemic therapy prior to rechallenge IPI+PD1 (of which 3 progressed on while receiving maintenance PD1), 5 had BRAFi/MEKi (33%), 2 (13%) had anti-PD1 monotherapy, 2 (13%) had investigational immunotherapy agents on a trial, and 1 pt had DTIC. At rechallenge, 13 pt received I3N1, 1pt I1N3 and 1 pt I3q12w + N1q2w, with a median 2 cycles of I. Only 1 pt had PR, 1 had SD, while 13 (87%) had PD, with mPFS2 only 2.7 mo (95% CI 2- NA). OS from rechallenge was 7.5 mo (95% CI 6.7- NA). All 7 pt with prior treatment-limiting irAE had the same irAE recur, except for 1 pt who died one week after re-exposure of PD, and 1 pt with prior pneumonitis who remained on 10mg prednisone without recurrence.
Conclusions
Rechallenge with IPI + PD1 appears to have little efficacy in those with acquired resistance and prior toxicity often recurs. An expanded multi-institutional analysis is under way.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A. Hepner: Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. M.S. Carlino: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: AMGEN; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche. D.B. Johnson: Advisory / Consultancy: Array Biopharma; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Incyte; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): Incyte; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Genentech. O.A. Michielin: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD. G.V. Long: Advisory / Consultancy: Aduro; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Mass-Array; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche. A.M. Menzies: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5218 - Elevated driver mutational burden or number of perturbed pathways and poor response to abiraterone or enzalutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Presenter: Bram De Laere
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2452 - High proportion of multiple KRAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA and tumor tissue of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Min Kyeong Kim
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3328 - Biological difference of tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) status in patients (pts) with somatic vs. germline BRCA1/2-mutated advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancers using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing analysis in the GOZILA study
Presenter: Yasuyuki Kawamoto
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3022 - Cell-Free DNA to Detect Focal Versus Non-Focal MET Amplification in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: Combined Analysis from Japan and the United States
Presenter: Mishima Saori
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2833 - Presence of circulating tumor DNA in surgically resected renal cell carcinoma is associated with advanced disease and poor patient prognosis
Presenter: Andres Correa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1376 - Combined genomic and epigenomic assessment of cell-free circulating tumor DNA (cfDNA) for cancer diagnosis and recurrence-risk assessment in early-stage lung cancer
Presenter: Junghee Lee
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4050 - DEMo: a prospective evaluation of a prognostic clinico-molecular composite score in NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy.
Presenter: Arsela Prelaj
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4727 - Bespoke circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis as a predictive biomarker in solid tumor patients (pts) treated with single agent pembrolizumab (P)
Presenter: Cindy Yang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3662 - Dynamic changes in whole-genome cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to identify disease progression prior to imaging in advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Andrew Davis
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3817 - Evaluation of Microsatellite Instability Testing Through cell-free DNA sequencing
Presenter: Shile Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract