Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session 3

3817 - Evaluation of Microsatellite Instability Testing Through cell-free DNA sequencing

Date

30 Sep 2019

Session

Poster Display session 3

Topics

Translational Research

Tumour Site

Presenters

Shile Zhang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_5): v25-v54. 10.1093/annonc/mdz239

Authors

S. Zhang, J.S. LoCoco, A. Mentzer, B.M. Crain, S. Katz, G. Berry, Y. Fu, T. Jiang, C. Zhao, S. Bilke, T. Pawlowski, K. Kruglyak

Author affiliations

  • Clinical Genomics, Illumina, 92122 - San Diego/US

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 3817

Background

Microsatellite instability (MSI) status has been approved by FDA to select for patients with metastatic tumors for cancer immunotherapy treatments. Additionally, MSI status is used in assessment of prognosis and treatment choices in certain cancer types, as well as the first step in the genetic diagnosis for Lynch syndrome. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a noninvasive, real-time approach used for comprehensive genomic profiling of cancer. However, only a small fraction of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragments originate from tumor cells, requiring an ultra-sensitive method to detect MSI status from cfDNA. Here we evaluate the performance of Illumina TruSight™ Oncology 500 panel for MSI testing through cfDNA sequencing.

Methods

We developed a robust method to assess MSI status in cfDNA. For each MSI locus, we assessed the repeat length distribution of the test subject and a cohort of normal samples. By comparing allele distributions with information-theory based approach, we determined if each of the MSI locus was unstable. Final MSI score was calculated using the number of unstable sites divided by total tested sites. To assess the analytical performance of our method, we titrated MSI-high (MSI-H) cell lines into MSI stable (MSS) background at a series of concentrations ranging from 0.31% to 5.0%, representing low tumor fractions in cfDNA samples. Additionally, we processed 94 clinical samples with matched FFPE tumor and cfDNA to examine the concordance of MSI testing between FFPE and cfDNA.

Results

For titrated MSI-H samples with low tumor fraction, we achieved 100% sensitivity in samples at 0.625% MSI-H content titration into MSS background. Moreover, we achieved 98.9% overall percent agreement (93/94) for MSI status between matched FFPE and cfDNA samples with a wide range of tumor content.

Conclusions

Our evaluation indicates that we can accurately determine MSI status in cfDNA samples with a wide range of tumor content.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Illumina.

Disclosure

S. Zhang: Full / Part-time employment: Illumina. J.S. LoCoco: Full / Part-time employment: Illumina. A. Mentzer: Full / Part-time employment: Illumina. B.M. Crain: Full / Part-time employment: Illumina. S. Katz: Full / Part-time employment: Illumina. G. Berry: Full / Part-time employment: Illumina. Y. Fu: Full / Part-time employment: Illumina. T. Jiang: Full / Part-time employment: Illumina. C. Zhao: Full / Part-time employment: Illumina. S. Bilke: Full / Part-time employment: Illumina. T. Pawlowski: Full / Part-time employment: Illumina. K. Kruglyak: Full / Part-time employment: Illumina.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.