Abstract 3565
Background
Pooled analyses from 2 phase III trials of patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with eribulin (E) versus other chemotherapy showed improved overall survival (OS) favoring E. Subsequent subgroup analyses, including pts with visceral metastases (VM), also showed improved OS when treated with E. Current 3rd line mBC chemotherapy options include E, gemcitabine (G) and capecitabine (C), among others. This study evaluated 1-year (yr) OS in a real world setting among mBC pts with VM treated with E, G, or C in a US cancer center network.
Methods
This retrospective study investigated pts with mBC with biopsy proven VM (liver and/or lung), treated with E, G, or C in 3rd line chemotherapy from 1/1/2012 to 11/1/2018. Electronic health records and cancer registry data were used to detect differences in OS (number of mons from start of 3rd line until death). Univariate and multivariate analyses of 1-yr survival between E, G, and C were conducted using Kaplan Meier (KM) and Cox proportional hazard (CPH) models respectively.
Results
Of 1,828 mBC pts, 1,417 had VM, and 443 (27.5% triple negative, 13.7% HER2+ and 51.9% ER+/PR+) received 3rd line therapy with E = 229 (51.7%), G = 134 (30.2%) or C = 80(18.1%). On average, E, G, and C pts did not differ by age, ethnicity, BMI or ECOG score (categorized as good [0-1] and poor [>2]), but E pts had higher mean income compared to G or C. 1-yr KM survival analyses included 370 pts (n = 195 E, 117 G, and 58 C) with at least 1-yr follow up. 150 patients (45% E, 33% G, and 41% C) were alive at the end of 1-yr. Survival curves between E, G, and C differed significantly (Logrank p < 0.05; Wilcoxon p < 0.05). Censored median survival of E pts was 9.75 mons compared to 6.95 for G (p < 0.05) and 7.48 for C pts, respectively. CPH analysis adjusted for age, ethnicity, ECOG score, BMI, and adverse events showed significant survival benefit for E pts compared to G (HR = 0.71, p < 0.05), but no significant differences between E vs C or C vs G pts.
Conclusions
This real-world 1-yr survival analysis of pts with mBC and VM demonstrated significantly better OS for pts receiving E as compared to G, and a trend favoring OS for patients receiving E in comparison to C.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Eisai Inc.
Funding
Eisai Inc.
Disclosure
S.M. Kazmi: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eisai, Takeda, Lilly, Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck, Takeda. E. Wang: Non-remunerated activity/ies, Eisai employee at the time of research: Eisai. R.S. Hauser: Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai. P.A. Kaufman: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), research grant support, and consulting fees: Eisai. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1694 - Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus mFOLFOX or FOLFIRI in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): KEYNOTE-651 Cohorts B and D
Presenter: Richard Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
908 - Romidepsin (FK228) Regulates the Expression of the Immune Checkpoint Ligand PD-L1 and Exerts Synergistic Anti-Tumor Activity with an Anti-PD-1 Antibody in Colon Cancer
Presenter: Hui Li
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3127 - Prognostic significance of circulating regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) under treatment with first line chemotherapy.
Presenter: Zafeiris Zafeiriou
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5416 - The SAFFO study: Sex-related prognostic role And cut-oFf deFinition of monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in metastatic colOrectal cancer
Presenter: Camilla Lisanti
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2518 - SPICE, a phase I study of enadenotucirev in combination with nivolumab in tumors of epithelial origin: analysis of the metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the dose escalation phase
Presenter: Marwan Fakih
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4000 - Phase 1/2 study with CXCL12 inhibitor NOX-A12 and pembrolizumab in patients with microsatellite-stable, metastatic colorectal or pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Niels Halama
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2223 - Microsatellite Instability Status in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Effect of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors on Survival in MSI-High Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Presenter: Wataru Okamoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2569 - Phase II trial of Trametinib (T) and Panitumumab (Pmab) in RAS/RAF wild type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Presenter: Kanan Alshammari
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5402 - Microsatellite instability and immunogenicity in colorectal cancer – do resident memory Tcells (Trm) play a role in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Wei Toh
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5472 - Early response evaluation and CEA response in patients treated in a Danish randomized study comparing trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) with or without bevazicumab in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Presenter: Camilla Qvortrup
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract