Abstract 3565
Background
Pooled analyses from 2 phase III trials of patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with eribulin (E) versus other chemotherapy showed improved overall survival (OS) favoring E. Subsequent subgroup analyses, including pts with visceral metastases (VM), also showed improved OS when treated with E. Current 3rd line mBC chemotherapy options include E, gemcitabine (G) and capecitabine (C), among others. This study evaluated 1-year (yr) OS in a real world setting among mBC pts with VM treated with E, G, or C in a US cancer center network.
Methods
This retrospective study investigated pts with mBC with biopsy proven VM (liver and/or lung), treated with E, G, or C in 3rd line chemotherapy from 1/1/2012 to 11/1/2018. Electronic health records and cancer registry data were used to detect differences in OS (number of mons from start of 3rd line until death). Univariate and multivariate analyses of 1-yr survival between E, G, and C were conducted using Kaplan Meier (KM) and Cox proportional hazard (CPH) models respectively.
Results
Of 1,828 mBC pts, 1,417 had VM, and 443 (27.5% triple negative, 13.7% HER2+ and 51.9% ER+/PR+) received 3rd line therapy with E = 229 (51.7%), G = 134 (30.2%) or C = 80(18.1%). On average, E, G, and C pts did not differ by age, ethnicity, BMI or ECOG score (categorized as good [0-1] and poor [>2]), but E pts had higher mean income compared to G or C. 1-yr KM survival analyses included 370 pts (n = 195 E, 117 G, and 58 C) with at least 1-yr follow up. 150 patients (45% E, 33% G, and 41% C) were alive at the end of 1-yr. Survival curves between E, G, and C differed significantly (Logrank p < 0.05; Wilcoxon p < 0.05). Censored median survival of E pts was 9.75 mons compared to 6.95 for G (p < 0.05) and 7.48 for C pts, respectively. CPH analysis adjusted for age, ethnicity, ECOG score, BMI, and adverse events showed significant survival benefit for E pts compared to G (HR = 0.71, p < 0.05), but no significant differences between E vs C or C vs G pts.
Conclusions
This real-world 1-yr survival analysis of pts with mBC and VM demonstrated significantly better OS for pts receiving E as compared to G, and a trend favoring OS for patients receiving E in comparison to C.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Eisai Inc.
Funding
Eisai Inc.
Disclosure
S.M. Kazmi: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eisai, Takeda, Lilly, Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck, Takeda. E. Wang: Non-remunerated activity/ies, Eisai employee at the time of research: Eisai. R.S. Hauser: Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai. P.A. Kaufman: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), research grant support, and consulting fees: Eisai. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2104 - Clinical implications of regorafenib-induced hypothyroidism in metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies: A prospective evaluation
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2143 - Clinical impact of BRAF V600E mutations in patients (pts) with resectable solitary colorectal liver metastases (CRLM)
Presenter: Shin Kobayashi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3136 - Trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer: an updated multicentre real-world analysis on efficacy, safety and predictive factors.
Presenter: Chara Stavraka
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4234 - Correlation between p53 expression and clinical outcome in RAS/BRAF wild type metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving later-line irinotecan-cetuximab
Presenter: Eleonora Lai
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4287 - Safety and effectiveness of aflibercept + FOLFIRI for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): OZONE secondary analyses
Presenter: Ian Chau
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1820 - A Phase Ib study of the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) + cobimetinib (cobi) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Presenter: Johanna Bendell
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5644 - Development and validation of a metastasis-associated immune prognostic model for concurrent metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Zhiwen Luo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5697 - Prognostic role of blood cell count-based immuno-inflammatory parameters in the Valentino trial
Presenter: Giovanni Fuca
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4704 - Evaluation of safety, immunogenicity and preliminary efficacy of PolyPEPI1018 vaccine in subjects with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with a predictive biomarker
Presenter: Joleen Hubbard
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3266 - Morphology of tumor-associated macrophages dictates the prognosis of patients with colorectal liver metastases.
Presenter: Matteo Donadon
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract