Abstract 3964
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have revolutionised the treatment of solid tumours with durable responses in cancers with previously limited treatment options. Despite significant improvements in overall survival for some patients(pt), identifying biomarkers to select a population most likely to benefit from CPIs remains challenging.
Methods
We characterized fresh tumour biopsies from 82 pts with metastatic cancer through the Personalised OncoGenomics (POG) program at BC Cancer using whole genome (80X tumour, 40X normal) and transcriptome analysis (WGTA). Subsequently pts were treated with a CPI as part of their standard cancer care. Baseline characteristics and follow up data were collected retrospectively. Durable clinical benefit (DCB) was defined as > 6 months(m) without disease progression and overall survival (OS) from date of first CPI treatment to death.
Results
The 82 pts (59% female) biopsied comprised a heterogeneous cohort: non-small cell lung cancer (30%), breast (17%) and colorectal cancer (13%) were most common, and most patients (45%) had received 1-2 prior treatments. 17 patients (21%) had a DCB and the median follow-up from first dose CPI was 9.2m. Higher tumour mutation burden (>10mut/Mb exome) was predictive of a longer median time to progression/death (TTPD) (5.9 vs 2.6m, p = 0.0055, HR = 0.44) and OS (14.6 vs 7.9m, p = 0.039, HR = 0.52). A higher predicted CD8+ T cell score (CIBERSORT) also predicted for a prolonged median TTPD (3.4 vs 2.4 m, p = 0.0094, HR = 0.51) and OS (12.9 vs 5.3m, p = 0.0014, HR = 0.42). In contrast, patients with PD-L1 expression > 80th percentile did not have a significantly different TTPD or OS. In addition to characterizing individual biomarkers, we note that patients with combinations of markers, particularly high TMB and CD8+ T cell scores, have a further improvement in median TTPD (5.9 vs 2.4m, p = 0.013) and OS (14.5 vs 5.4m, p = 0.014).
Conclusions
The complexity of interpreting the tumour-immune interface to predict CPI efficacy remains challenging, but WGTA allows for identification of combination biomarkers that may help to identify responders. The presence of two or more biomarkers predicted for CPI response in this patient cohort and may more successfully identify these patients in prospective studies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
BC Cancer Foundation.
Disclosure
J. Lavoie: Research grant / Funding (self): University of British Columbia. S. Yip: Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer. D. Renouf: Honoraria (self): Celgene; Honoraria (self): Servier; Honoraria (self): Taiho; Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer. J.J. Laskin: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche Canada; Honoraria (self): BI Canada; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca Canada; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer Canada. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3140 - Phase 2 study of olaparib in previously treated advanced solid tumors with homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm) or homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD): LYNK-002
Presenter: David Hyman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2655 - The K-BASKET trial: A prospective phase II biomarker-driven multiple basket trial in Korean solid cancer patients.
Presenter: Seul Kim
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5938 - Cambridge Liquid biopsy “CALIBRATION” study: Can changes in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) predict durable tumour responses in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer receiving MEDI4736?
Presenter: Constanza Linossi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3799 - Validation of a tumour mutational burden workflow on routine histological samples of colorectal cancer and assessment of a cohort with synchronous hepatic metastases
Presenter: Andrea Mafficini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4647 - Microsatellite Instability Testing and Lynch Syndrome Screening For Colorectal Cancer Patients Through Tumor Sequencing
Presenter: Li Liu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3231 - "Liquid Withdarw" technique in CT-guided cutting needle lung biopsy: decreased incidence of complications and increased tissue amount for lung cancer molecular testing.
Presenter: Xue Wang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3282 - WGS Implementation in standard cancer Diagnostics for Every cancer patient (WIDE)
Presenter: Paul Roepman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5905 - Known and unknown gene fusion detection capabilities of solid tumor laboratories conducting next generation sequencing in 6 countries
Presenter: Steph Finucane
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4238 - Clinical and Analytical Accuracy of a 523 Gene Panel Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Assay on Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Solid Tumor Samples
Presenter: Ina Deras
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2493 - Methylation analysis of MLH1 using droplet digital PCR and methylation sensitive restriction enzyme.
Presenter: Celine De Rop
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract