Abstract 1352
Background
The best use of bone targeted agents (BTAs), i.e. how patients (pts) profit most from treatment, optimal timing of treatment start and frequency of administration as well as duration of treatment is unclear to date.
Methods
Physicians were asked to indicate the criteria they use for the indication and administration of BTAs in pts with bone metastases from solid tumors in Switzerland (physician-related outcomes, PO) during a period of 3 months. Patterns of care (POC) was assessed by questions about reasons for BTA administration, treatment pattern, patient characteristics, and actual treatment. Pts completed a pain and bone-pain related quality of life questionnaire.
Results
PO: Most of the physicians reported to start treatment with BTAs according to current guidelines (70.9%, 61/86). A smaller proportion would first assess the risk (high vs low) for developing skeletal-related events (SREs) to decide about treatment initiation (24.4%, 21/86). Factors contributing to define high risk were former SREs (89.5%, 77/86), lytic bone metastases (87.2%, 75/86), and high burden of disease (67.4%, 58/86), respectively. POC: The majority of the pts have been treated with BTAs immediately after the diagnosis of bone metastases (73.6%, 307/417). The main reasons for treatment with BTAs were high risk of bone complications (43%, 132/307), bone pain (21.8%, 67/307), and location of bone metastases (10.1%, 31/307), respectively. Denosumab was the most frequently used BTA (78.5%; 241/307), and a 3-4 week interval was most common (88.9%; 273/307). SREs were reported in 8.5% of treated vs 7.3% of non-treated pts, and were similar in pts rated as low or as high risk (about 8%).
Conclusions
The majority of the pts was treated according to current guideline recommendations with regard to start and interval of BTA treatment. The number of SREs was low irrespective of BTA treatment or risk classification for SREs, which may reflect a high impact of systemic cancer treatment on SRE reduction, or a selection of the pts according to risk factors not defined as the ones in the literature.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
SAKK.
Funding
Amgen.
Disclosure
M.T. Mark: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Böhringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS. B.J.K. Thuerlimann: Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer. R. von Moos: Advisory / Consultancy: amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1728 - A phase III trial evaluating olanzapine 5 mg for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving cisplatin: J-FORCE Study
Presenter: Hironobu Hashimoto
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
920 - Efficacy of intravenous (IV) NEPA, a fixed NK1/5-HT3 receptor antagonist (RA) combination, for prevention of CINV following cisplatin- and anthracycline cyclophosphamide (AC)-based chemotherapy (CT)
Presenter: Lee Schwartzberg
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5146 - Efficacy of olanzapine combination in prevention of nausea & vomiting in highly emetogenic chemotherapy
Presenter: Smitha Saldanha
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1947 - Patient-reported outcome data during real-world use of NEPA for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in high-risk platin-receiving patients - A prospective multicenter trial
Presenter: Meinolf Karthaus
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
6163 - A study evaluating steroid induced metabolic syndrome after antiemetic dexamethasone therapy in patients received high emetic risk chemotherapy
Presenter: Hee Jun Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2154 - High incidence of nausea during initial and repeated courses if intravenous chemotherapy in patients receiving guideline consistent antiemetic prophylaxis - a prospective, observational, real world study.
Presenter: Teresa Smit
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1637 - "Randomised controlled trial of Scalp Cooling (SC) for the prevention of Chemotherapy Induced Alopecia (CIA)”
Presenter: Jyoti Bajpai
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5351 - Performance of the ‘4S rule’ to predict short-term outcomes in cancer outpatients with unsuspected pulmonary embolism.
Presenter: David Pesántez Coronel
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1189 - Prevalence of venous thromboembolism based on intensive screening for patients with advanced solid tumor in prospective observational study
Presenter: Shota Omori
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4340 - Short-term outcomes of cancer patients with pulmonary embolism according to the setting (hospital-acquired vs. outpatient) at diagnosis.
Presenter: Diego Muñoz Guglielmetti
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract