Abstract 1352
Background
The best use of bone targeted agents (BTAs), i.e. how patients (pts) profit most from treatment, optimal timing of treatment start and frequency of administration as well as duration of treatment is unclear to date.
Methods
Physicians were asked to indicate the criteria they use for the indication and administration of BTAs in pts with bone metastases from solid tumors in Switzerland (physician-related outcomes, PO) during a period of 3 months. Patterns of care (POC) was assessed by questions about reasons for BTA administration, treatment pattern, patient characteristics, and actual treatment. Pts completed a pain and bone-pain related quality of life questionnaire.
Results
PO: Most of the physicians reported to start treatment with BTAs according to current guidelines (70.9%, 61/86). A smaller proportion would first assess the risk (high vs low) for developing skeletal-related events (SREs) to decide about treatment initiation (24.4%, 21/86). Factors contributing to define high risk were former SREs (89.5%, 77/86), lytic bone metastases (87.2%, 75/86), and high burden of disease (67.4%, 58/86), respectively. POC: The majority of the pts have been treated with BTAs immediately after the diagnosis of bone metastases (73.6%, 307/417). The main reasons for treatment with BTAs were high risk of bone complications (43%, 132/307), bone pain (21.8%, 67/307), and location of bone metastases (10.1%, 31/307), respectively. Denosumab was the most frequently used BTA (78.5%; 241/307), and a 3-4 week interval was most common (88.9%; 273/307). SREs were reported in 8.5% of treated vs 7.3% of non-treated pts, and were similar in pts rated as low or as high risk (about 8%).
Conclusions
The majority of the pts was treated according to current guideline recommendations with regard to start and interval of BTA treatment. The number of SREs was low irrespective of BTA treatment or risk classification for SREs, which may reflect a high impact of systemic cancer treatment on SRE reduction, or a selection of the pts according to risk factors not defined as the ones in the literature.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
SAKK.
Funding
Amgen.
Disclosure
M.T. Mark: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Böhringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS. B.J.K. Thuerlimann: Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer. R. von Moos: Advisory / Consultancy: amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5152 - Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) can categorize elderly glioblastoma (GBM) patients into three groups predicting survival: a monoinstitutional study
Presenter: Eleonora Bergo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4079 - Triggering anti-GBM immune response with EGFR-mediated photoimmunotherapy
Presenter: Gabriela Kramer-marek
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4364 - Upregulation of sFRP3 circulating expression levels correlates survival outcomes in glioblastoma
Presenter: Gema Bruixola
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2327 - Characterization and pre-clinical modeling of genetic aberrations in pediatric gliomas
Presenter: Itai Moshe
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3154 - Preclinical Study of Novel Tetracyclic Small Molecule, CC12, for Brain Cancer
Presenter: Liyun Fann
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5759 - CHLOROBRAIN phase IB trial: The addition of chloroquine, an autophagy inhibitor, to concurrent radiation and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma
Presenter: Inge Compter
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1382 - A Phase II Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib Combined with dose-dense Temozolomide in Recurrent Glioblastoma
Presenter: Yong Wang
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4407 - Phase 0 Trial of Ceritinib in Brain Metastases and Recurrent Glioblastoma
Presenter: Shwetal Mehta
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1469 - Pembrolizumab (Pem) in recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) patients with mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd): an observational study
Presenter: Mario Caccese
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4217 - Outcome of high-grade gliomas (HGGs) treated into immunotherapeutic early-phase clinical trials (ieCTs): a single-center experience
Presenter: Matteo Simonelli
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract