Abstract 4139
Background
Selecting which pts may benefit from ieCTs is challenging. Few prognostic indexes have been proposed so far and none qualifying as a predictor of response. The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRImS) identifies two prognostic categories based on three objective variables (albumin<3.5 g/dL=1; LDH>ULN=1; NLR>6=1).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data of all pts enrolled into ieCTs at the Humanitas Cancer Center Phase I Unit between 2014 and 2019. A large series of demographic and clinical variables were correlated with overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) through univariate and multivariate analysis (UVA; MVA). Laboratory parameters were calculated either as baseline values and as dynamic six-weeks (6wks) changes. Finally, we explored the performance of the GRImS in our cohort.
Results
A total of 111 pts (M/F:63/48; median age: 62) with advanced solid tumors treated into ieCTs have been selected. The most frequent histologies were hepatocellular carcinoma (34%), lung carcinoma (22%), glioblastomas (13%). With a median follow-up (FU) of 14.3 months (mos), the OS was 12.9 mos, and the ORR 12.6%. In the UVA ECOG PS < 1 (HR = 0.53; IC 0.30-0.94; p = 0.030) and higher baseline value of albumin (HR = 0.40; IC 0.21-0.77; p = 0.006) were significantly associated with a better OS, while baseline total protein level (OR = 1.47; IC 1.24 - 2.10; p = 0.030), and increase in lymphocytes count at 6wks (OR = 1.02; IC 1.00-1.04; p = 0.029) were predictive of response. In the MVA only higher baseline value of albumin seems to confirm its independent prognostic value (HR = 0.48; IC 0.23-1.01; p = 0.054), as well as baseline total protein level its predictive role (OR = 1.52; IC 1-2.33; p = 0.052). The GRImS resulted prognostic, with pts at low-risk (≤1) having a significant better OS compared to pts with a high-risk score (>1) (14.3 mos vs 7.3 mos; p = 0.029), but not predictive.
Conclusions
We assessed the prognostic accuracy of GRImS in our ieCTs cohort. With limitations due to small sample size, short FU and few events recorded we identified additional static and dynamic variables with a potential prognostic and predictive relevance to be further explored in larger series and to be eventually included in new scores.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Simonelli: Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie. A. Santoro: Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Gilead; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Takeda; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert Testimony: Abbvie; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Servier; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Gilead; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Arqule; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: SANDOZ. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
603 - Mendelian Randomization Study of Alzheimer's Disease and Lung Cancer
Presenter: Huaqiang Zhou
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4462 - Spanish registry of thoracic tumors (TTR): Interim analyses of comorbidities, risk associations, personal and family history of cancer
Presenter: Rafael Lopez Castro
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3957 - Pleural effusion TGF-beta is highly diagnostic and prognostic in malignant pleural mesothelioma
Presenter: Paul Stockhammer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3583 - Immune microenvironment modulation by p14/ARF in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Presenter: Giulia Pasello
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4255 - Tumor Treating Fields plus chemotherapy for first-line malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): radiological responses in the STELLAR trial
Presenter: Federica Grosso
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1803 - Effects of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields; 150 kHz) and Cisplatin or Pemetrexed Combination Therapy on Mesothelioma cells In Vitro and In Vivo
Presenter: Mijal Munster
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2660 - Real world use of systemic therapy in elderly patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM)
Presenter: Susana Cedres
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3150 - Pemetrexed/Cisplatin versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as first-line treatment for Egyptian patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
Presenter: Mohamed Alorabi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4319 - Accuracy of pathologic evaluation for thymic epithelial tumors in an Italian reference Centre
Presenter: Giulia Galli
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4811 - Comprehensive genomic profiling of thymic carcinoma in a sample Chinese population
Presenter: Baohui Han
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract