Abstract 4139
Background
Selecting which pts may benefit from ieCTs is challenging. Few prognostic indexes have been proposed so far and none qualifying as a predictor of response. The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRImS) identifies two prognostic categories based on three objective variables (albumin<3.5 g/dL=1; LDH>ULN=1; NLR>6=1).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data of all pts enrolled into ieCTs at the Humanitas Cancer Center Phase I Unit between 2014 and 2019. A large series of demographic and clinical variables were correlated with overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) through univariate and multivariate analysis (UVA; MVA). Laboratory parameters were calculated either as baseline values and as dynamic six-weeks (6wks) changes. Finally, we explored the performance of the GRImS in our cohort.
Results
A total of 111 pts (M/F:63/48; median age: 62) with advanced solid tumors treated into ieCTs have been selected. The most frequent histologies were hepatocellular carcinoma (34%), lung carcinoma (22%), glioblastomas (13%). With a median follow-up (FU) of 14.3 months (mos), the OS was 12.9 mos, and the ORR 12.6%. In the UVA ECOG PS < 1 (HR = 0.53; IC 0.30-0.94; p = 0.030) and higher baseline value of albumin (HR = 0.40; IC 0.21-0.77; p = 0.006) were significantly associated with a better OS, while baseline total protein level (OR = 1.47; IC 1.24 - 2.10; p = 0.030), and increase in lymphocytes count at 6wks (OR = 1.02; IC 1.00-1.04; p = 0.029) were predictive of response. In the MVA only higher baseline value of albumin seems to confirm its independent prognostic value (HR = 0.48; IC 0.23-1.01; p = 0.054), as well as baseline total protein level its predictive role (OR = 1.52; IC 1-2.33; p = 0.052). The GRImS resulted prognostic, with pts at low-risk (≤1) having a significant better OS compared to pts with a high-risk score (>1) (14.3 mos vs 7.3 mos; p = 0.029), but not predictive.
Conclusions
We assessed the prognostic accuracy of GRImS in our ieCTs cohort. With limitations due to small sample size, short FU and few events recorded we identified additional static and dynamic variables with a potential prognostic and predictive relevance to be further explored in larger series and to be eventually included in new scores.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Simonelli: Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie. A. Santoro: Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Gilead; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Takeda; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert Testimony: Abbvie; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Servier; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Gilead; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Arqule; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: SANDOZ. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2185 - Sequential treatment with afatinib followed by 3rd generation EGFR-TKI – subgroup analysis of the GIDEON trial: a prospective non-interventional study (NIS) in EGFR mutated NSCLC patients in Germany
Presenter: Wolfgang Brückl
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1524 - Effectiveness of sequencing TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A French National medico administrative claim database analysis
Presenter: Nicolas Girard
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5733 - Phase II study of osimertinib in NSCLC patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation: A multicenter trial of the Korean Cancer Study Group (LU17-19)
Presenter: Tae Min Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5440 - Different stories for different EGFR exon 19 deletion variants
Presenter: Chao Zhao
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2982 - Safety and activity of alflutinib in patients with advanced EGFR T790M mutation non-small cell lung cancer who progressed after EGFR-TKI therapy
Presenter: Yuan-Kai Shi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4002 - Afatinib followed by osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) advanced NSCLC: updated data from the GioTag real-world study
Presenter: Maximilian Hochmair
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2941 - Treatment patterns of EGFR mt+ NSCLC IV pts: Real world data of the NOWEL network
Presenter: Julia Roeper
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4154 - TP53 mutations predicts worse prognosis in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients receiving TKIs in first- or further line of treatment
Presenter: Matteo Canale
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1175 - HER3 ligand heregulin expression and clinical implication in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Presenter: Kimio Yonesaka
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2023 - Patients with brain metastases treated with afatinib in clinical practice – results from the prospective non-interventional study GIDEON
Presenter: Eckart Laack
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract