Abstract 2342
Background
The FIRSTANA trial compared docetaxel 75mg/m2 Q3W (D75), cabazitaxel 20mg/m2 Q3W (C20) and cabazitaxel 25mg/m2 Q3W (C25) in patients with chemo-naive mCRPC (Oudard 2017). FIRSTANA enrolled patients regardless of presence of disease-related symptoms. This post-hoc analysis of FIRSTANA evaluates the influence of progression type on outcomes.
Methods
Patient outcomes (OS, PSA response [confirmed PSA decline from baseline ≥ 50%] and radiological PFS [rPFS]) were analyzed according to progression type at randomization. Progression at randomization was defined as follows: PSA progression only (PSA-p) with no radiological progression (Radio-p) and no pain, Radio-p (± PSA-p, no pain), pain progression (mean Present Pain Intensity ≥2 and/or mean analgesic score ≥ 10 over the 7 days prior to randomization (±PSA-p, ±Radio-p).
Results
PSA-p, Radio-p and Pain-p were present in 34.4%, 23.2% and 42.3% of patients at randomization, respectively. Pain progression at initiation of chemotherapy was associated with features of aggressive disease and a shorter OS. Lower activity of C20 than C25 and D75 was observed in patients with Pain-p.Table:
859P
Progression type | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
PSA-p N = 362 | Radio-p N = 244 | Pain-p N = 445 | Global p° | |
- PSA decrease ≥ 50% - Overall - D75 - C20 - C25 | 69.0% 67.4% 71.0% 69.0% | 69.8% 65.8% 66.2% 78.3% | 58.0% 62.2% 49.3% 63.0% | P = 0.003 P = 0.70 P = 0.002 P = 0.21 |
-rPFS, median [95% CI]* - Overall - D75 - C20 - C25 | 16.5 [14.3; 18.9] 13.5 [11.3; 16.7] 19.7 [14.3; 26.5] 18.2 [14.2; 22.6] | 12.1 [11.2; 14.4] 11.3 [9.7; 14.4] 13.4 [10.6; 22.8] 11.4 [10.1; 15.7] | 10.8 [9.3;11.6] 11.4 [8.8; 13.9] 9.1 [7.6; 10.9] 11.1 [9.7; 12.8] | p < 0.001 p = 0.13 p < 0.001 p = 0.001 |
OS, median [95% CI]* - Overall - D75 - C20 - C25 | 27.7 [25.4;31.2] 29.0 [22.6; 36.6] 30.0 [24.9; NR] 26.5 [24.0; 31.6] | 30.6 [26.8;34.3] 28.4 [22.0; 34.1] 32.1 [27.9; 41.4] 29.7 [24.0; 38.5] | 18.5 [16.8; 20.6] 20.3[16.5;24.3] 16.5[14.3; 19.1] 20.4[17.0;25.3] | p < 0.001 p = 0.003 p < 0.001 p = 0.031 |
in months, NR: not reached; °Log rank test for rPFS and OS, CMH test adjusted on stratification factors
Conclusions
Most patients in FIRSTANA had pain progression at randomization and this factor was associated with worse OS. In this post-hoc, subgroup analysis, C20 appeared less active than D75 and C25 in men with baseline pain progression.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Nicolas Delanoy.
Funding
Sanofi.
Disclosure
N. Delanoy: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Honoraria (self): Tesaro; Honoraria (self): MSD. D. Robbrecht: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer. K. Fizazi: Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self): Astellas; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Clovis; Honoraria (self): CureVac; Honoraria (self): Essa; Honoraria (self): Genentech; Honoraria (self): Janssen; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): Orion; Honoraria (self): Sanofi. F. Mercier: Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Stat Process is a CRO providing statistical services to various companies: Stat Process. O. Sartor: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Eli Lilly; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: GlaxoSmithKline; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Noria; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Bellicum; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Johnson &Johnson; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Dendreon; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Endocyte; Advisory / Consultancy: Constellation Pharmaceuticals; Advisory / Consultancy: Advanced Accelerator Applications; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Bavarian Nordic; Advisory / Consultancy: Oncogenex; Advisory / Consultancy: EMD Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Progenics. R. de Wit: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech. S. Oudard: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Ipsen.
Resources from the same session
4543 - Long-term real-world (RW) outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma (MEL) treated with ipilimumab (IPI) and non-IPI therapies: IMAGE study
Presenter: Stéphane Dalle
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4523 - Prognostic Factors for efficacy of Ipilimumab used after AntiPD1 and/or BRAF+MEK inhibitors in Melanoma Patients: an Italian Melanoma Intergroup study
Presenter: Riccardo Marconcini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3632 - Rechallenge with combination ipilimumab and anti-PD-1 (IPI+PD1) in metastatic melanoma after acquired resistance to IPI+PD1 immunotherapy
Presenter: Adriana Hepner
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3732 - Clinicopathologic characteristics of immune colitis in melanoma patients treated with combination ipilimumab and anti-PD1 (IPI+PD1) and PD1 monotherapy.
Presenter: Kazi Nahar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5005 - Real-world outcomes of ipilimumab plus nivolumab for advanced melanoma in the Netherlands
Presenter: Michiel van Zeijl
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5524 - Utilization of Real-World Data to Assess the Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) in Elderly Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Presenter: D Scott Ernst
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5884 - Tumor mutational burden and response to PD-1 inhibitors: an analysis of 89 cases of metastatic melanoma.
Presenter: Léa Dousset
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3120 - Increase in S100B and LDH as early outcome predictors for non-responsiveness to anti-PD-1 monotherapy in advanced melanoma.
Presenter: Elisa Rozeman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2157 - Immune status defined by molecular information layers predicts response to pembrolizumab treatment in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Guillermo Prado-Vázquez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2553 - Interim analysis of a phase Ib study of cobimetinib plus atezolizumab in patients with advanced BRAFV600 wild type melanoma progressing on prior anti-PD-L1 therapy
Presenter: Shahneen Sandhu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract