Abstract 2342
Background
The FIRSTANA trial compared docetaxel 75mg/m2 Q3W (D75), cabazitaxel 20mg/m2 Q3W (C20) and cabazitaxel 25mg/m2 Q3W (C25) in patients with chemo-naive mCRPC (Oudard 2017). FIRSTANA enrolled patients regardless of presence of disease-related symptoms. This post-hoc analysis of FIRSTANA evaluates the influence of progression type on outcomes.
Methods
Patient outcomes (OS, PSA response [confirmed PSA decline from baseline ≥ 50%] and radiological PFS [rPFS]) were analyzed according to progression type at randomization. Progression at randomization was defined as follows: PSA progression only (PSA-p) with no radiological progression (Radio-p) and no pain, Radio-p (± PSA-p, no pain), pain progression (mean Present Pain Intensity ≥2 and/or mean analgesic score ≥ 10 over the 7 days prior to randomization (±PSA-p, ±Radio-p).
Results
PSA-p, Radio-p and Pain-p were present in 34.4%, 23.2% and 42.3% of patients at randomization, respectively. Pain progression at initiation of chemotherapy was associated with features of aggressive disease and a shorter OS. Lower activity of C20 than C25 and D75 was observed in patients with Pain-p.Table:
859P
Progression type | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
PSA-p N = 362 | Radio-p N = 244 | Pain-p N = 445 | Global p° | |
- PSA decrease ≥ 50% - Overall - D75 - C20 - C25 | 69.0% 67.4% 71.0% 69.0% | 69.8% 65.8% 66.2% 78.3% | 58.0% 62.2% 49.3% 63.0% | P = 0.003 P = 0.70 P = 0.002 P = 0.21 |
-rPFS, median [95% CI]* - Overall - D75 - C20 - C25 | 16.5 [14.3; 18.9] 13.5 [11.3; 16.7] 19.7 [14.3; 26.5] 18.2 [14.2; 22.6] | 12.1 [11.2; 14.4] 11.3 [9.7; 14.4] 13.4 [10.6; 22.8] 11.4 [10.1; 15.7] | 10.8 [9.3;11.6] 11.4 [8.8; 13.9] 9.1 [7.6; 10.9] 11.1 [9.7; 12.8] | p < 0.001 p = 0.13 p < 0.001 p = 0.001 |
OS, median [95% CI]* - Overall - D75 - C20 - C25 | 27.7 [25.4;31.2] 29.0 [22.6; 36.6] 30.0 [24.9; NR] 26.5 [24.0; 31.6] | 30.6 [26.8;34.3] 28.4 [22.0; 34.1] 32.1 [27.9; 41.4] 29.7 [24.0; 38.5] | 18.5 [16.8; 20.6] 20.3[16.5;24.3] 16.5[14.3; 19.1] 20.4[17.0;25.3] | p < 0.001 p = 0.003 p < 0.001 p = 0.031 |
in months, NR: not reached; °Log rank test for rPFS and OS, CMH test adjusted on stratification factors
Conclusions
Most patients in FIRSTANA had pain progression at randomization and this factor was associated with worse OS. In this post-hoc, subgroup analysis, C20 appeared less active than D75 and C25 in men with baseline pain progression.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Nicolas Delanoy.
Funding
Sanofi.
Disclosure
N. Delanoy: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Honoraria (self): Tesaro; Honoraria (self): MSD. D. Robbrecht: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer. K. Fizazi: Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self): Astellas; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Clovis; Honoraria (self): CureVac; Honoraria (self): Essa; Honoraria (self): Genentech; Honoraria (self): Janssen; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): Orion; Honoraria (self): Sanofi. F. Mercier: Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Stat Process is a CRO providing statistical services to various companies: Stat Process. O. Sartor: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Eli Lilly; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: GlaxoSmithKline; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Noria; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Bellicum; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Johnson &Johnson; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Dendreon; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Endocyte; Advisory / Consultancy: Constellation Pharmaceuticals; Advisory / Consultancy: Advanced Accelerator Applications; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Bavarian Nordic; Advisory / Consultancy: Oncogenex; Advisory / Consultancy: EMD Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Progenics. R. de Wit: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech. S. Oudard: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Ipsen.
Resources from the same session
4370 - Continental differences in pathologic response with neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) plus nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma in the phase 2 OpACIN-neo trial.
Presenter: Irene Reijers
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3230 - Comparable responses of melanoma at primary site and synchronous lymph node metastases upon neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO)
Presenter: Judith Versluis
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3171 - Adjuvant Therapies for Stage III Melanoma: Benchmarks for Bringing Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice
Presenter: Tina HIEKEN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3493 - Mixture-cure modeling for resected stage III/IV melanoma in the phase 3 CheckMate 238 trial
Presenter: Jeffrey Weber
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3036 - An open-label, non-randomized, phase IIIb study of trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for patients with unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: a subgroup analysis of patients with brain metastasis
Presenter: Caroline Dutriaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2233 - Adverse event (AE) kinetics in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib + trametinib (D + T) in the metastatic and adjuvant setting
Presenter: Jean Jacques Grob
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2435 - A Single Arm, Open Label, Phase II, Multicenter Study to Assess the Detection of the BRAF V600 Mutation on cfDNA from Plasma in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1766 - Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAFV600 Mutation-positive Melanoma in the Real-World Setting – Interim results of the non-interventional COMBI-r study
Presenter: Carola Berking
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2131 - Trial update: A randomized Phase Ib/II study of the selective small molecule Axl inhibitor Bemcentinib (BGB324) in combination with either dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) or pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma
Presenter: Oddbjørn Straume
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4074 - Analysis of pyrexia in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib (D) and/or trametinib (T) across clinical trials
Presenter: Caroline Robert
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract