Abstract 2342
Background
The FIRSTANA trial compared docetaxel 75mg/m2 Q3W (D75), cabazitaxel 20mg/m2 Q3W (C20) and cabazitaxel 25mg/m2 Q3W (C25) in patients with chemo-naive mCRPC (Oudard 2017). FIRSTANA enrolled patients regardless of presence of disease-related symptoms. This post-hoc analysis of FIRSTANA evaluates the influence of progression type on outcomes.
Methods
Patient outcomes (OS, PSA response [confirmed PSA decline from baseline ≥ 50%] and radiological PFS [rPFS]) were analyzed according to progression type at randomization. Progression at randomization was defined as follows: PSA progression only (PSA-p) with no radiological progression (Radio-p) and no pain, Radio-p (± PSA-p, no pain), pain progression (mean Present Pain Intensity ≥2 and/or mean analgesic score ≥ 10 over the 7 days prior to randomization (±PSA-p, ±Radio-p).
Results
PSA-p, Radio-p and Pain-p were present in 34.4%, 23.2% and 42.3% of patients at randomization, respectively. Pain progression at initiation of chemotherapy was associated with features of aggressive disease and a shorter OS. Lower activity of C20 than C25 and D75 was observed in patients with Pain-p.Table:
859P
Progression type | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
PSA-p N = 362 | Radio-p N = 244 | Pain-p N = 445 | Global p° | |
- PSA decrease ≥ 50% - Overall - D75 - C20 - C25 | 69.0% 67.4% 71.0% 69.0% | 69.8% 65.8% 66.2% 78.3% | 58.0% 62.2% 49.3% 63.0% | P = 0.003 P = 0.70 P = 0.002 P = 0.21 |
-rPFS, median [95% CI]* - Overall - D75 - C20 - C25 | 16.5 [14.3; 18.9] 13.5 [11.3; 16.7] 19.7 [14.3; 26.5] 18.2 [14.2; 22.6] | 12.1 [11.2; 14.4] 11.3 [9.7; 14.4] 13.4 [10.6; 22.8] 11.4 [10.1; 15.7] | 10.8 [9.3;11.6] 11.4 [8.8; 13.9] 9.1 [7.6; 10.9] 11.1 [9.7; 12.8] | p < 0.001 p = 0.13 p < 0.001 p = 0.001 |
OS, median [95% CI]* - Overall - D75 - C20 - C25 | 27.7 [25.4;31.2] 29.0 [22.6; 36.6] 30.0 [24.9; NR] 26.5 [24.0; 31.6] | 30.6 [26.8;34.3] 28.4 [22.0; 34.1] 32.1 [27.9; 41.4] 29.7 [24.0; 38.5] | 18.5 [16.8; 20.6] 20.3[16.5;24.3] 16.5[14.3; 19.1] 20.4[17.0;25.3] | p < 0.001 p = 0.003 p < 0.001 p = 0.031 |
in months, NR: not reached; °Log rank test for rPFS and OS, CMH test adjusted on stratification factors
Conclusions
Most patients in FIRSTANA had pain progression at randomization and this factor was associated with worse OS. In this post-hoc, subgroup analysis, C20 appeared less active than D75 and C25 in men with baseline pain progression.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Nicolas Delanoy.
Funding
Sanofi.
Disclosure
N. Delanoy: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Honoraria (self): Tesaro; Honoraria (self): MSD. D. Robbrecht: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer. K. Fizazi: Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self): Astellas; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Clovis; Honoraria (self): CureVac; Honoraria (self): Essa; Honoraria (self): Genentech; Honoraria (self): Janssen; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): Orion; Honoraria (self): Sanofi. F. Mercier: Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Stat Process is a CRO providing statistical services to various companies: Stat Process. O. Sartor: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Eli Lilly; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: GlaxoSmithKline; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Noria; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Bellicum; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Johnson &Johnson; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Dendreon; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Endocyte; Advisory / Consultancy: Constellation Pharmaceuticals; Advisory / Consultancy: Advanced Accelerator Applications; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Bavarian Nordic; Advisory / Consultancy: Oncogenex; Advisory / Consultancy: EMD Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Progenics. R. de Wit: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech. S. Oudard: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Ipsen.
Resources from the same session
5056 - Phase 2 study of 2 dosing regimens of cemiplimab, a human monoclonal anti–PD-1, in metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (mCSCC)
Presenter: Danny Rischin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5710 - Avelumab for advanced Merkel cell carcinoma in the Netherlands; a nationwide survey
Presenter: Sonja Levy
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3152 - Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma receiving second-line or later avelumab treatment: 36-month follow-up data
Presenter: Sandra D'Angelo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5715 - A Phase 2, Randomized Study of Nivolumab (NIVO) and Ipilimumab (IPI) versus NIVO, IPI and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC, NCT03071406) – a preliminary report.
Presenter: Sungjune Kim
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2854 - Real-world impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic uveal melanoma
Presenter: Kalijn Bol
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2928 - Immune checkpoint inhibitors in a cohort of 206 metastatic uveal melanomas patients
Presenter: Mathilde Saint-Ghislain
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1235 - Incidence and survival of Uveal Melanoma occurring as single cancer versus its occurrence as a first or second primary neoplasm
Presenter: Ahmad Alfaar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3615 - Validation of a Clinicopathological and Gene Expression Profile (CP-GEP) Model for Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma
Presenter: Evalyn Mulder
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1793 - External validation of the 8th Edition Melanoma Staging System of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program
Presenter: Angelina Tjokrowidjaja
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4278 - Clinical factors and overall survival (OS) associated with patterns of metastases (mets) in melanoma patients (pts).
Presenter: Ines Pires da Silva
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract