Abstract 1096
Background
OncotypeDX (ODX®) can enhance prediction of breast cancer recurrence, guiding adjuvant treatment options. However, the opportunity to access this test is not always possible. The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation between phenotypical tumor characteristics, quantitative classical immunohistochemistry (IHC) and recurrent score (RS) resulting from ODX®.
Methods
All breast cancer patients who underwent ODX® between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively included in the study. The data selected for analysis were age, menopausal status, pathological and IHC features. IHC was performed with standardized quantitative methods. Dataset was split into two subsets (70% for training and 30% for internal validation). Logistic models were built with statistically significant features for predicting RS ≤ 25 or ≤ 20. An external validation set, provided by another center, was used to test reliability of prediction models.
Results
The internal dataset included 407 patients (Table) who underwent ODX®. Mean age was 53.7 (31-80) and 222 patients (54.55%) were > 50 years old. ODX® results showed: 67 patients (16.6%) between 0-10, 272 patients between 11-25 (66.8%) and 68 pts > 26 (16.6%). At the logistic regression analysis, RS score was significantly associated with ER (p = 0.004), PgR (p < 0.001), and Ki67% (p < 0.001) with the threshold equal to 25. Above patients with RS ≤ 25, the generalized linear regression resulted in a well calibrated model with an AUC of 92.2% (sensitivity 84.2%; specificity 80.1%). External validation set included 180 patients and confirmed the model performance with an AUC of 82.3% and good calibration. A nomogram predicting RS score ≤25 was generated.Table:
261P Tumor characteristics training set + internal test set
Training + internal test set – Tumor characteristics | ||
---|---|---|
Histological subtype classification | Invasive Ductal Carcinoma | 318 pts (78,1%) |
Invasive Lobular Carcinoma | 47 pts (11,5%) | |
Other | 42 pts (10,3%) | |
Grading | 1 | 28 pts (6.8%) |
2 | 268 pts (65,8%) | |
3 | 111 pts (27,3%) | |
pT | 1a | 3 pts (0,7%) |
1b | 38 pts (9,3%) | |
1c | 216 pts (53,1%) | |
2 | 143 pts (35,1%) | |
3 | 6 pts (1,5%) | |
4 | 1 pt (0,3%) | |
pN | 0 | 233 pts (57,2%) |
0i+ | 12 pts (3%) | |
1mic | 43 pts (10,6%) | |
1 | 108 pts (26,5%) | |
NA | 11 pts (2,7%) | |
Mean T diameter [cm] | 1.9 (Range 0,2-8,5) | |
Mean Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) diameter [mm] | 1.7 (Range 0-40) | |
Mean Axillary Lymph Node (ALN) diameter [mm] | 0.8 (Range 0-25) | |
Mean N Ratio | 0.14 (0.00 – 1.00) | |
SLN involvement [n° of nodes] | 0 | 261 pts (64,1%) |
1 | 112 pts (27,5%) | |
2 | 24 pts (5,8%) | |
3 | 1 pt (0,2%) | |
NA | 9 pts (2,2%) | |
ALN involvement [n° of nodes] | 0 | 338 pts (83%) |
0i+ | 4 pts (1%) | |
1mic | 3 pts (0,7%) | |
1 | 31 pts (7,6%) | |
2 | 8 pts (2%) | |
3 | 5 pts (1,2%) | |
5 | 1 pt (0,2%) | |
NA | 17 pts (4,1%) | |
Multifocality | Yes | 97 pts (23,8%) |
No | 300 pts (73,7%) | |
NA | 10 pts (2.5%) | |
Multicentricity | Yes | 20 pts (4,9%) |
No | 376 pts (92,4%) | |
NA | 11 pts (2,7%) | |
PVI | Absent | 242 pts (59,4%) |
Focal | 51 pts (12,5%) | |
Moderate | 32 pts (7,8%) | |
Massive | 59 pts (14,5%) | |
NA | 23 pts (5,6%) | |
Mean ER expression | 87,9% (Range 1-100) | |
Mean PgR expression | 62.2% (Range 0-100) | |
Mean AR expression | 7.7% (Range 0-90) | |
Mean Ki67% expression | 29.8% (Range 0-90) | |
Her2 Expression | 0 | 187 pts (46%) |
1 | 112 pts (27,5%) | |
2 | 104 pts (25,5%) | |
NA | 4 pts (0,9%) | |
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER-2 | Not determined | 300 pts (73,7%) |
Not amplificated | 100 pts (23,7%) | |
Undetermined | 1 pt (0,2%) | |
Equivocal | 1 pt (0,2%) |
Conclusions
Quantitative IHC presents a good correlation with RS score in patients with RS ≤ 25, also in external validation set. A nomogram for physician that enhances a cost/effectiveness clinical approach practice has been developed. Prospective clinical application will be tested in further studies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Fabio Marazzi.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3006 - Nal-iri/lv5-fu versus paclitaxel as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OESIRI-PRODIGE 62): A FFCD multicenter, randomized, phase II study.
Presenter: Violaine Randrian
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3697 - The expression of Versican and its role in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor
Presenter: Zhao Sun
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
6073 - Characteristics of patients with thyroid carcinoma in the united states
Presenter: Dina El-Habashy
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2124 - The discrimination of pituitary adenomas and craniopharyngioma on MRI: from image features to texture features
Presenter: Hanyue Xu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3786 - Proportion of Peripheral Lymphocyte Subsets Correlates with the Progression-free Survival and Metastatic Status of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients
Presenter: Yitao Gong
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2263 - Immunohistochemical expression of ER-α and PR in papillary thyroid carcinoma
Presenter: Enas Elkhouly
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4386 - SILVELUL Project: Immunohistochemical panel analyses as potential predictive and prognostic factors in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (PanNET) Treated with CAPTEM or Everolimus
Presenter: Ana De Jesus-Acosta
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2302 - Carcinoid heart disease (CHD): the CRUSOE-NETs, a prospective cohort study from the French Group of Endocrine Tumors (GTE)
Presenter: Kathleen Dekeister Geoffroy
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5749 - Safety of high doses of somatostatin analogs in well differentiated NENs in elderly
Presenter: Massimiliano Cani
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3931 - Differences in multikinase inhibitors (MKI) toxicity profile according to gender. A pooled analysis of three phase II trials with lenvatinib, pazopanib and sorafenib in patients (pts) with advanced gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).
Presenter: Jorge Hernando Cubero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract