Abstract 2344
Background
The Economist Intelligence Unit takes a strategic approach to understand the impact of policy on lung cancer. Recommendations from our research, sponsored by MSD, will assist countries to improve systemic responses because outcomes remain poor and costs remain high despite scientific progress.
Methods
Our research centres on 13 countries: Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UK. Our literature review drew evidence from internationally-recognised sources and falls into 5 domains operationalised by 17 indicators assessing performance across the entire patient journey. After consultation with European experts, we populated our scorecard comparing policy and practice, examining service delivery, systems, access, financing and governance. Examination of preliminary findings in country workshops with clinicians, patient organisations and other key stakeholders enabled us to obtain nuanced information providing a clearer grasp on care than obtained from desk research alone.
Results
While patches of good practice exist, no country scores highly across all of our measurements. All but one country has a national cancer control plan: 75% are over five years old and do not incorporate recent oncological innovations. Clinical guidelines lack details on accelerating suspected lung cancer patients for diagnosis, referral pathways to secondary/tertiary care, supportive/palliative care, shared decision-making and psychological support within a specified time. Cancer registries exist in each country, yet clinicians report that clinically-focused cancer registries could house important information. Only 5 countries reimburse all four commonly used biomarkers for lung cancer.
Conclusions
Room for improvement in lung cancer policy exists across all the countries and domains we have studied. Our workshops ensured we focus on the most important opportunities for improving the delivery of lung cancer care relevant for each country. Now, based on the recommendations coming out of the research and agreed upon by stakeholders, we are in the policy development phase of our work where our goal is to assist policymakers improve care for people living with lung cancer in Europe.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
MSD.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3367 - Treatment-Free Survival, With and Without Toxicity, as a Novel Outcome Applied to Immuno-Oncology Agents in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Presenter: Meredith Regan
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5105 - Fresh blood Immune cell monitoring in patients treated with nivolumab in the GETUG-AFU26 NIVOREN study: association with toxicity and treatment outcome
Presenter: Aude DESNOYER
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1877 - Advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (accRCC): association of microRNAs (miRNAs) with molecular subtypes, mRNA targets and outcome.
Presenter: Annelies Verbiest
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5543 - Prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and antibiotics (ATB) use are associated with distinct gut microbiota ‘guilds’ in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients
Presenter: Valerio Iebba
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2689 - mTOR mutations are not associated with shorter PFS and OS in patients treated with mTOR inhibitors
Presenter: Cristina Suarez Rodriguez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3069 - Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and genomic alterations by body mass index (BMI) in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Aly-Khan Lalani
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5089 - Finding the Right Biomarker for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC): Nivolumab treatment induces the expression of specific peripheral lymphocyte microRNAs in patients with durable and complete response.
Presenter: Lorena Incorvaia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2594 - Algorithms derived from quantitative pathology can be a gatekeeper in patient selection for clinical trials in localised clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)
Presenter: In Hwa Um
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2566 - High baseline blood volume is an independent favorable prognostic factor for overall and progression-free survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Aska Drljevic-nielsen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2675 - Impact of estimand selection on adjuvant treatment outcomes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Daniel George
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract