Abstract 2344
Background
The Economist Intelligence Unit takes a strategic approach to understand the impact of policy on lung cancer. Recommendations from our research, sponsored by MSD, will assist countries to improve systemic responses because outcomes remain poor and costs remain high despite scientific progress.
Methods
Our research centres on 13 countries: Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UK. Our literature review drew evidence from internationally-recognised sources and falls into 5 domains operationalised by 17 indicators assessing performance across the entire patient journey. After consultation with European experts, we populated our scorecard comparing policy and practice, examining service delivery, systems, access, financing and governance. Examination of preliminary findings in country workshops with clinicians, patient organisations and other key stakeholders enabled us to obtain nuanced information providing a clearer grasp on care than obtained from desk research alone.
Results
While patches of good practice exist, no country scores highly across all of our measurements. All but one country has a national cancer control plan: 75% are over five years old and do not incorporate recent oncological innovations. Clinical guidelines lack details on accelerating suspected lung cancer patients for diagnosis, referral pathways to secondary/tertiary care, supportive/palliative care, shared decision-making and psychological support within a specified time. Cancer registries exist in each country, yet clinicians report that clinically-focused cancer registries could house important information. Only 5 countries reimburse all four commonly used biomarkers for lung cancer.
Conclusions
Room for improvement in lung cancer policy exists across all the countries and domains we have studied. Our workshops ensured we focus on the most important opportunities for improving the delivery of lung cancer care relevant for each country. Now, based on the recommendations coming out of the research and agreed upon by stakeholders, we are in the policy development phase of our work where our goal is to assist policymakers improve care for people living with lung cancer in Europe.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
MSD.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5763 - cfDNA is an acceptable but insufficient means of characterizing FGFR3 mutation in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)
Presenter: Sumanta Pal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5877 - Efficacy of anti-PD(L)1 treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer based on mRNA- and protein- based PD-L1 determination: Results from the multicentric, retrospective FOsMIC trial
Presenter: Jonas Jarczyk
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5204 - A differential bladder microbiota composition is associated with tumor grade in bladder cancer.
Presenter: Monica Parra-Grande
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4904 - Molecular characterization of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in prior or current smokers (PCS) vs non-smokers (NS)
Presenter: Victor Sacristan Santos
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5370 - Evaluation of different diagnostic methods for identification of FGFR alteration in advanced urothelial carcinomas: Proficiency Results based on multiple RNA extraction kits and mutation detection methods
Presenter: Veronika Weyerer
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2579 - Title: Genomic characterization of non-schistosomiasis-related squamous cell carcinoma (NSR-SCC) of the urinary bladder: a retrospective study of potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers
Presenter: Esmail Al-ezzi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2203 - TiNivo: Tivozanib combined with nivolumab results in prolonged progression free survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Final Results.
Presenter: Philippe Barthelemy
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4712 - First-Line Pembrolizumab (pembro) Monotherapy for Advanced Non‒Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (nccRCC): Updated Follow-Up for KEYNOTE-427 Cohort B
Presenter: Cristina Suárez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2091 - First-Line Pembrolizumab (pembro) Monotherapy in Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC): Updated Follow-Up For KEYNOTE-427 Cohort A
Presenter: James Larkin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2368 - Association Between Depth of Response and Overall Survival: Exploratory Analysis in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (aRCC) in CheckMate 214
Presenter: Viktor Grünwald
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract