Abstract 5905
Background
Developments in next generation sequencing (NGS) have revolutionized oncogenic biomarker detection, removing the limitations of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to allow for massive parallel sequencing to detect multiple oncogenic gene fusions. We believe NGS testing platforms are not uniform within the current solid tumor lab landscape, with NGS analysis capabilities ranging from SNPs only to SNPs and known gene fusions, potentially missing crucial biomarkers. The objective of this study was to determine the current NGS capability of solid tumor labs to detect unknown fusions.
Methods
This study used real-world clinical pathology solid tumor labs data from the United States, United Kingdom, France, Spain, Italy, and Germany that conduct NGS. The Diaceutics proprietary global database of more than 2500 labs was analysed across these markets in Q4 2018 to understand NGS testing capabilities currently available within the routine clinical lab setting.
Results
The results of the study are presented in the table. Of the 131 labs in the US performing NGS, only 50 were able to detect fusions. Of those 50 labs, 42 were restricted to using panels designed to detect specific known fusions. Only 8 labs in the US were able to detect unknown fusions. This pattern was reflected in labs surveyed in 5 other countries.Table: 1409P
Solid tumor labs: NGS panel use and gene fusion detection
Country | Number of solid tumor labs performing NGS | Number of labs that can detect fusions | Number of labs that can detect known fusions | Number of labs that can detect known and unknown fusions |
---|---|---|---|---|
US | 131 | 50 | 42 | 8 |
France | 39 | 11 | 7 | 4 |
Germany | 21 | 5 | 4 | 1 |
Spain | 23 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Italy | 30 | 7 | 6 | 1 |
UK | 24 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
Conclusions
Labs are not well equipped to handle the pace of advancement in biomarker testing. While targeted treatments and companion diagnostics usher in a new age of precision medicine in cancer and extend survival times, many labs lack the technology needed to accurately identify emerging gene fusion biomarkers, especially unknown fusions. This results in both confusion among physicians regarding testing adequacy and missed opportunities for improved outcomes among patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Diaceutics.
Funding
Diaceutics.
Disclosure
S. Finucane: Full / Part-time employment: Diaceutics. S. Haridas: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Diaceutics. L. Handley: Full / Part-time employment: Diaceutics. J. Clark: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Diaceutics. A. Jack: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Diaceutics. S. Munksted: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Diaceutics.
Resources from the same session
5389 - Two-weekly accelerated BEP (aBEP) regimen as induction chemotherapy (CT) in intermediate and poor prognosis patients (pts) with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT): final results of phase II trial.
Presenter: Alexey Tryakin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2934 - Differential expression of circulating miR375 and miR371 to detect teratoma and viable germ cell malignancy
Presenter: Lucia Nappi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3585 - Prognosis of anaemia in disseminated testicular germ cell tumours. On behalf of the Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group (SGCCG)
Presenter: Esmeralda Garcia Torralba
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2254 - The Effects Of Primary Testicular Tumor Localization On Prognosis In Patients With Nonseminomatous Testis Cancer
Presenter: Birol Yildiz
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4505 - Initial Results of a Phase II study of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Metastatic Adrenal Tumors.
Presenter: Matthew Campbell
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3369 - NEMIO: a randomized phase II trial evaluating efficacy and safety of dose dense MVAC (ddMVAC) + durvalumab +/- tremelimumab as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with bladder muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Constance Thibault
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2075 - KEYNOTE-866: Phase 3 Study of Perioperative Pembrolizumab (pembro) or Placebo (pbo) in Combination With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Cisplatin (cis)-Eligible Patients (pts) With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4824 - KEYNOTE-905: A Phase 3 Study of Cystectomy Plus Perioperative Pembrolizumab Versus Cystectomy Alone in Cisplatin (cis)-Ineligible Patients (pts) With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC)
Presenter: Matthew Galsky
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2253 - Phase 3 LEAP-011 trial: First-Line Pembrolizumab With Lenvatinib in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Ineligible to Receive Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4310 - PULSE : A Single Arm Trial Assessing The Activity and Safety of Avelumab Immunotherapy Maintenance among Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Squamous Cell Penile Carcinoma (mSCPC).
Presenter: Noemie Gassian
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract