Abstract 5905
Background
Developments in next generation sequencing (NGS) have revolutionized oncogenic biomarker detection, removing the limitations of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to allow for massive parallel sequencing to detect multiple oncogenic gene fusions. We believe NGS testing platforms are not uniform within the current solid tumor lab landscape, with NGS analysis capabilities ranging from SNPs only to SNPs and known gene fusions, potentially missing crucial biomarkers. The objective of this study was to determine the current NGS capability of solid tumor labs to detect unknown fusions.
Methods
This study used real-world clinical pathology solid tumor labs data from the United States, United Kingdom, France, Spain, Italy, and Germany that conduct NGS. The Diaceutics proprietary global database of more than 2500 labs was analysed across these markets in Q4 2018 to understand NGS testing capabilities currently available within the routine clinical lab setting.
Results
The results of the study are presented in the table. Of the 131 labs in the US performing NGS, only 50 were able to detect fusions. Of those 50 labs, 42 were restricted to using panels designed to detect specific known fusions. Only 8 labs in the US were able to detect unknown fusions. This pattern was reflected in labs surveyed in 5 other countries.Table: 1409P
Solid tumor labs: NGS panel use and gene fusion detection
Country | Number of solid tumor labs performing NGS | Number of labs that can detect fusions | Number of labs that can detect known fusions | Number of labs that can detect known and unknown fusions |
---|---|---|---|---|
US | 131 | 50 | 42 | 8 |
France | 39 | 11 | 7 | 4 |
Germany | 21 | 5 | 4 | 1 |
Spain | 23 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Italy | 30 | 7 | 6 | 1 |
UK | 24 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
Conclusions
Labs are not well equipped to handle the pace of advancement in biomarker testing. While targeted treatments and companion diagnostics usher in a new age of precision medicine in cancer and extend survival times, many labs lack the technology needed to accurately identify emerging gene fusion biomarkers, especially unknown fusions. This results in both confusion among physicians regarding testing adequacy and missed opportunities for improved outcomes among patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Diaceutics.
Funding
Diaceutics.
Disclosure
S. Finucane: Full / Part-time employment: Diaceutics. S. Haridas: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Diaceutics. L. Handley: Full / Part-time employment: Diaceutics. J. Clark: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Diaceutics. A. Jack: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Diaceutics. S. Munksted: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Diaceutics.
Resources from the same session
5056 - Phase 2 study of 2 dosing regimens of cemiplimab, a human monoclonal anti–PD-1, in metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (mCSCC)
Presenter: Danny Rischin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5710 - Avelumab for advanced Merkel cell carcinoma in the Netherlands; a nationwide survey
Presenter: Sonja Levy
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3152 - Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma receiving second-line or later avelumab treatment: 36-month follow-up data
Presenter: Sandra D'Angelo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5715 - A Phase 2, Randomized Study of Nivolumab (NIVO) and Ipilimumab (IPI) versus NIVO, IPI and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC, NCT03071406) – a preliminary report.
Presenter: Sungjune Kim
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2854 - Real-world impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic uveal melanoma
Presenter: Kalijn Bol
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2928 - Immune checkpoint inhibitors in a cohort of 206 metastatic uveal melanomas patients
Presenter: Mathilde Saint-Ghislain
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1235 - Incidence and survival of Uveal Melanoma occurring as single cancer versus its occurrence as a first or second primary neoplasm
Presenter: Ahmad Alfaar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3615 - Validation of a Clinicopathological and Gene Expression Profile (CP-GEP) Model for Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma
Presenter: Evalyn Mulder
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1793 - External validation of the 8th Edition Melanoma Staging System of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program
Presenter: Angelina Tjokrowidjaja
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4278 - Clinical factors and overall survival (OS) associated with patterns of metastases (mets) in melanoma patients (pts).
Presenter: Ines Pires da Silva
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract