Abstract 3447
Background
Conflicting results on the the impact of cancer first treatment delay (FTD) on survival have been reported between several studies, and its importance has yet to be determined. We currently do not have any study in breast cancer (BC) analyzing how FTD influences the prognosis of the patients according to different inmunophenotypes. We conducted a study where we examined the relationship between survival and three periods of diagnostic-therapeutic delay, 30, 60 and 90 days.
Methods
This multicentre cohort study included BC patients from screening CAMISS PROJECT, during 2000-2006 with follow-up until 2014. Cox regression analysis, crude and multivariate, was applied to estimate risk of death. The Hazard Ratio (HR) was adjusted by FTD, stage, immunophenotypes of BC and comorbidity
Results
The study included 738 women aged 45-69 years. Median time of FTD was 58 days. First treatment aplied was surgery for all populations. 42% of BC presented as stage I and 34% stage II. 24% of patients had comorbidities. 21% expressed HER2, 80% estrogen receptors and 61% progresterone. There were 53% of Luminal A tumors, followed by 27% Luminal B, of which 10% also expressed HER2, 9% were HER2 overexpressing tumors, and 11% triple negative. In the crude analysis none of the three FDT cut-off points had a significant relationship with overall survival. Multivariate analysis adjusted for phenotypes, comorbidity and stage, showed worse prognosis tendency in DT30 and DT90, with a statistically significant level in DT60, hazard ratio [HR] 1,57; 95% IC (1,04-2,38). When we analyzed survival according to DT60 and BC subtypes there was more significant risk of death among HER2 subtype HR 2,91; 95% IC (1,63-5,21) and triple negative HR 1,90; 95% IC(1,01-3,60) comparing to Luminal A. No relationship was seen in Luminal B; Table.Table:
251P
aHR30 | aHR60 | aHR90 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment delay (days) | <30 | Ref | ||
> =30 | 1,53 (0,84-2,78) | |||
<60 | R | |||
> =60 | 1,57 (1,04-2,38) | |||
<90 | Ref | |||
> =90 | 1,72(1,00-2,95) | |||
Stage | I | Ref | Ref | Ref |
InSitu | 0,29 (0,07-1,24) | 0,29 (0,07-1,23) | 1,47 (0,89-2,44) | |
II | 1,40 (0,84-2,33) | 1,38 (0,83-2,30) | 3,01 (1,67-5,41) | |
III | 4,42 (2,66-7,35) | 4,43 (2,67-7,35) | 1,95 (1,02-3,72) | |
Fenotipe | Luminal A | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Luminal B | 1,40 (0,85-2,31) | 1,45 (0,88-2,40) | 0,29 (0,07-1,22) | |
Her2 | 2,89 (1,62-5,18) | 2,91 (1,63-5,21) | 1,38 (0,83-2,31) | |
Triple Negative | 1,96 (1,01-3,66) | 1,90 (1,01-3,60) | 4,23 (2,56-7,01) | |
Comorbidity | Absence | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Presence | 1,63 (1,06-2,52) | 1,61 (1,04-2,48) | 1,59 (1,03-2,46) |
Conclusions
Waiting 60 days to initiate treatment was associated with a significantly worse overall survivall among triple negative and HER2 BC. We consider it of importance to offer early treatment to aggressive BC subtypes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
REDISSEC-CAMISS Group-(Research Network in Health Services in Chronic Diseases).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4401 - Real-world effectiveness of first-line palbociclib + letrozole for metastatic breast cancer 4 years post approval in the US
Presenter: Jonathan Kish
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5876 - Palbociclib-Fulvestrant (PALBO-FUL) and Everolimus -Exemestane (EVE-EXE) for Second line Hormonal Treatment (HT) of Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) with Lobular Histology: a Propensity Score Matched Analysis of a Multicenter ‘Real-World’ Patients (pts) Series.
Presenter: Armando Orlandi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3587 - Dose-escalation study of G1T48, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), in postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC)
Presenter: E Dees
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5696 - Final results of the STEM trial: SFX-01 in the Treatment and Evaluation of ER+ Her2- Metastatic breast cancer (mBC)
Presenter: Sacha Howell
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1475 - Alpelisib (ALP) + Fulvestrant (FUL) in Hormone-Receptor Positive (HR+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2–Negative (HER2–) Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC): Subgroup Analysis by Presence of Visceral Metastasis (VM) in the SOLAR-1 Trial
Presenter: Mario Campone
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2549 - Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study of a Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator RAD140 in Estrogen Receptor Positive (ER+), HER2 Negative (HER2-) Breast Cancer (BC)
Presenter: Erika Hamilton
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3787 - A Phase I study of XZP-3287, a novel oral CDK4/6 Inhibitor, administered on a continuous dosing schedule, in patients with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Binghe Xu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4835 - Phase-I dose-escalation and expansion study of the PARP inhibitor, fluzoparib (SHR3162), in patients with advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Huiping Li
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5083 - Phase 2 study of DHP107 (Liporaxel®, oral paclitaxel) in first-line, HER2 negative recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (OPTIMAL study, NCT03315364)
Presenter: Jin-Hee Ahn
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2674 - Multicenter Phase I Trial of Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) in Combination with Non-Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (NPLD) in HER2[+] Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC). THELMA Study
Presenter: Elena López-Miranda
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract