Abstract 3447
Background
Conflicting results on the the impact of cancer first treatment delay (FTD) on survival have been reported between several studies, and its importance has yet to be determined. We currently do not have any study in breast cancer (BC) analyzing how FTD influences the prognosis of the patients according to different inmunophenotypes. We conducted a study where we examined the relationship between survival and three periods of diagnostic-therapeutic delay, 30, 60 and 90 days.
Methods
This multicentre cohort study included BC patients from screening CAMISS PROJECT, during 2000-2006 with follow-up until 2014. Cox regression analysis, crude and multivariate, was applied to estimate risk of death. The Hazard Ratio (HR) was adjusted by FTD, stage, immunophenotypes of BC and comorbidity
Results
The study included 738 women aged 45-69 years. Median time of FTD was 58 days. First treatment aplied was surgery for all populations. 42% of BC presented as stage I and 34% stage II. 24% of patients had comorbidities. 21% expressed HER2, 80% estrogen receptors and 61% progresterone. There were 53% of Luminal A tumors, followed by 27% Luminal B, of which 10% also expressed HER2, 9% were HER2 overexpressing tumors, and 11% triple negative. In the crude analysis none of the three FDT cut-off points had a significant relationship with overall survival. Multivariate analysis adjusted for phenotypes, comorbidity and stage, showed worse prognosis tendency in DT30 and DT90, with a statistically significant level in DT60, hazard ratio [HR] 1,57; 95% IC (1,04-2,38). When we analyzed survival according to DT60 and BC subtypes there was more significant risk of death among HER2 subtype HR 2,91; 95% IC (1,63-5,21) and triple negative HR 1,90; 95% IC(1,01-3,60) comparing to Luminal A. No relationship was seen in Luminal B; Table.Table:
251P
aHR30 | aHR60 | aHR90 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment delay (days) | <30 | Ref | ||
> =30 | 1,53 (0,84-2,78) | |||
<60 | R | |||
> =60 | 1,57 (1,04-2,38) | |||
<90 | Ref | |||
> =90 | 1,72(1,00-2,95) | |||
Stage | I | Ref | Ref | Ref |
InSitu | 0,29 (0,07-1,24) | 0,29 (0,07-1,23) | 1,47 (0,89-2,44) | |
II | 1,40 (0,84-2,33) | 1,38 (0,83-2,30) | 3,01 (1,67-5,41) | |
III | 4,42 (2,66-7,35) | 4,43 (2,67-7,35) | 1,95 (1,02-3,72) | |
Fenotipe | Luminal A | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Luminal B | 1,40 (0,85-2,31) | 1,45 (0,88-2,40) | 0,29 (0,07-1,22) | |
Her2 | 2,89 (1,62-5,18) | 2,91 (1,63-5,21) | 1,38 (0,83-2,31) | |
Triple Negative | 1,96 (1,01-3,66) | 1,90 (1,01-3,60) | 4,23 (2,56-7,01) | |
Comorbidity | Absence | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Presence | 1,63 (1,06-2,52) | 1,61 (1,04-2,48) | 1,59 (1,03-2,46) |
Conclusions
Waiting 60 days to initiate treatment was associated with a significantly worse overall survivall among triple negative and HER2 BC. We consider it of importance to offer early treatment to aggressive BC subtypes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
REDISSEC-CAMISS Group-(Research Network in Health Services in Chronic Diseases).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5873 - Association between PIK3CA mutation status and development of brain metastases in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Donna Fitzgerald
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3588 - The role of AXL as mechanism of resistance to trastuzumab and a prognostic factor in breast cancer HER2 positive: a translational approach.
Presenter: Anna Adam-Artigues
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5640 - Untargeted assessment of tumor fractions in plasma for monitoring and prognostication from metastatic breast cancer patients undergoing systemic treatment
Presenter: Marija Balic
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2616 - Clinical application of mutational analysis in breast cancer patients: the relevance of PIK3CA analysis for precision medicine.
Presenter: Juan Miguel Cejalvo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3870 - A retrospective gene expression analysis of surgically-removed Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis (BCBM)
Presenter: Meritxell Mallafré-Larrosa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1240 - Endocrine therapy alone versus targeted combination strategy as first line treatment in elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: meta-analysis of Phase II and III randomized clinical trials
Presenter: Claudia Omarini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5535 - Alpelisib (ALP) + fulvestrant (FUL) for patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+), HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC): management and time course of key adverse events of special interest (AESIs) in SOLAR-1
Presenter: Hope Rugo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3093 - Changes in Hormone-Receptor status in Luminal breast cancers between primary tumor and metastases: results of the observational cohort GIM-13 AMBRA Study
Presenter: Marina Cazzaniga
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1378 - MONARCH 3: Updated time to chemotherapy and disease progression following abemaciclib plus aromatase inhibitor (AI) in HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC)
Presenter: Miguel Martín
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3536 - Palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer in US clinical practices: Real-world progression-free survival analysis
Presenter: Mylin Torres
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract