Abstract 4118
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized treatment of advanced NSCLC. In France, concerns have been raised as to the financial burden of these therapies and fear that potential patients may be ruled out. The reality of budgetary restrictions implies for choices to be made considering both the quality of life these treatments procure as well as the financial burden they represent. From a physician’s point of view, due to financial constraints on public health facilities, physicians could restrain themselves from prescribing innovative expensive therapies.
Methods
This qualitative study questions the potential impact of drug prices on prescription choices made by thoracic oncologists. Ten French oncologists and two hospital pharmacists voluntarily underwent a semi-structured interview conducted by a student in an Ethics master’s degree. Interviews consisted of two distinct parts: one clinical case where treatment choices had to be made in the first-line and second-line advanced NSCLC setting and a second part consisting of open-ended questions.
Results
Qualitative analysis of the interviews brings out that immunotherapy has radically changed the history of cancer treatment but that hopes in advanced NSCLC need to be tempered. Efficacy in a real-world setting is difficult to predict and efforts need to be made to identify accurate biomarkers. Financial matters are a source of discussions between fellow physicians and clinical pharmacists but not with patients. Physicians consider they have a duty to strictly respect guidelines particularly in a French universal healthcare system.
Conclusions
Rising costs of innovative drugs in oncology is a reality that forces a reconsideration of healthcare and drug regulation systems in order to be able to provide access to innovation for all eligible patients in the French universal healthcare system. Addressing this issue with physicians provides important insight on how treatment choices are made, their expertise and their involvement in this matter. Physicians are concerned about access to innovation for their patients and consider they ought to remain aware of these issues in order to participate in healthcare arbitration discussions.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Laboratoire Ethique Médicale - Université Paris Descartes.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1541 - TERT gene fusions characterize a subset of metastatic Leydig cell tumors
Presenter: Bozo Kruslin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5389 - Two-weekly accelerated BEP (aBEP) regimen as induction chemotherapy (CT) in intermediate and poor prognosis patients (pts) with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT): final results of phase II trial.
Presenter: Alexey Tryakin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2934 - Differential expression of circulating miR375 and miR371 to detect teratoma and viable germ cell malignancy
Presenter: Lucia Nappi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3585 - Prognosis of anaemia in disseminated testicular germ cell tumours. On behalf of the Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group (SGCCG)
Presenter: Esmeralda Garcia Torralba
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2254 - The Effects Of Primary Testicular Tumor Localization On Prognosis In Patients With Nonseminomatous Testis Cancer
Presenter: Birol Yildiz
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4505 - Initial Results of a Phase II study of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Metastatic Adrenal Tumors.
Presenter: Matthew Campbell
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3369 - NEMIO: a randomized phase II trial evaluating efficacy and safety of dose dense MVAC (ddMVAC) + durvalumab +/- tremelimumab as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with bladder muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Constance Thibault
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2075 - KEYNOTE-866: Phase 3 Study of Perioperative Pembrolizumab (pembro) or Placebo (pbo) in Combination With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Cisplatin (cis)-Eligible Patients (pts) With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4824 - KEYNOTE-905: A Phase 3 Study of Cystectomy Plus Perioperative Pembrolizumab Versus Cystectomy Alone in Cisplatin (cis)-Ineligible Patients (pts) With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC)
Presenter: Matthew Galsky
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2253 - Phase 3 LEAP-011 trial: First-Line Pembrolizumab With Lenvatinib in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Ineligible to Receive Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract