Abstract 2196
Background
Despite decades of research, performance of DPYD genotyping to predict FP toxicity (tox) is poorly documented. GPCO-UNICANCER and RNPGx groups initiated the FUSAFE MA on individual patient data (IPD) to assess the prognostic value of consensual deleterious DPYD variants on grade (G) 4-5 FP tox.
Methods
Eligibility criteria included unbiased recruitment of Caucasian patients (pts) without FP dose adjustment based on DPD status. Main endpoint was 12 weeks hematological or digestive G4-5 tox. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), advanced stage (M- vs M+), FP drug (5FU vs capecitabine), FP administration (bolus±continuous vs continuous alone or p.o.) and associated anticancer drugs (AAD) were collected. Multivariable logistic models were applied. Performance was assessed by AUC and diagnostic indices maximizing Youden index.
Results
From the 18 identified eligible studies (10230 pts), 14 were included (9030 pts), with complete IPD collected for 6403 pts (84% colorectal, 16% M+, 66% 5FU, 80% AAD). G4-5 tox prevalence was 8% (518 events). DPYD variants *2A, D949V, *13 and HapB3 were carried by 0.9%, 1.2%, 0.2% and 3.9% of pts, respectively. The clinical model (M1) retained age, sex, BMI, FP-administration, AAD. Adding variants *2A/D949V/*13 (at least one mutated allele) significantly (p<.0001) improved the model (M2). Further adding HapB3 did not improve the model (p=.24, M3). M3-adjusted OR (95%CI) was 10.0 (6.9-14.7) for the 3 variants *2A/D949V/*13 and 2.1 (1.4-3.0) for HapB3. Similar results were observed on colorectal pts only, or when excluding bolus administration alone.Table:
569P
Model | AUC (area under the curve) | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | 0.725 | 69.7% | 65.4% | 15.1% | 96.1% |
M2 | 0.750 | 75.5% | 62.8% | 15.2% | 96.7% |
M3 | 0.752 | 76.4% | 61.9% | 15.0% | 96.8% |
Conclusions
This is the largest MA on DPYD genotyping and toxicity. It shows the relevance of clinical variables and of the 3 consensual DPYD variants. Despite its association with tox, HapB3 does not improve the discriminant ability to identify pts at risk of G4-5 toxicity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France (Dr Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi, coordinator).
Funding
French Cancer Institute (INCa) funding (PHRC-K 14-193 FUSAFE) and French Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer.
Disclosure
V. Boige: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck Serono; Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche Genentech; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Prestizia; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi. J. Taieb: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Lily; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Sirtex; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. D. Meulendijks: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca UK. C. Palles: Advisory / Consultancy: Oxford Cancer Biomarkers. U. Zanger: Licensing / Royalties: Robert Bosch GmbH. M. Boisdron-Celle: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Licensing / Royalties, Officer / Board of Directors: ODPM. A. Marinaki: Full / Part-time employment: Viapath. E. Gross: Licensing / Royalties: Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universitat Munchen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5629 - Outcome of triple negative inflammatory breast cancers (TNIBC) treated with dose dense neoadjuvant epirubicin cyclophosphmide, prognostic impact of pre and post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and post NAC lymphovascular invasion
Presenter: Luca Campedel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5792 - A novel PET parameter for cancer stem cell metabolism: early prediction of chemosensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer
Presenter: Chanwoo Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3728 - Using nodal ratio to predict recurrence in patients with 4 or more positive lymph nodes early stage breast cancer
Presenter: Besma Graja
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3395 - Re-sentinel node biopsy for local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery
Presenter: Yuka Matsubara
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4302 - Assessment of prognostic and therapeutic factors in men with breast cancer
Presenter: Daniel Herrero Rivera
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4263 - Genomic Profiling of Chinese Breast Cancer Patients
Presenter: Zhonghua Tao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2406 - Genome copy number alteration burden represents predictor of response in long-term, never relapse exceptional responders of trastuzumab-treated HER2+ metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Naomi Walsh
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2575 - Next-generation DNA Sequencing (NGS) Results for Tumors From Phase 2 ABRAZO Study of Talazoparib After Platinum or Cytotoxic Non-Platinum Regimens in Patients (pts) With Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) and Germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA) Mutations
Presenter: Nicholas C. Turner
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4499 - FGFR1 and CCND1 gene amplifications are associated with breast cancer resistance to aromatase inhibitors
Presenter: Evgeny Imyanitov
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4110 - Clinicopathologic features of BRCA mutated breast cancer patients: Hacettepe Experience
Presenter: Sercan Aksoy
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract