Abstract 857
Background
Colonoscopy is recommended as preferred test for first-degree relatives (FDRs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, colonoscopy screening rate remains low. A systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by the research team show that tailored communication is an effective approach to increase uptake of colonoscopy. However, the decision rules that guide the tailored process remain unclear. Based on the identified evidences, a mHealth intervention with an integrated tailoring decision system was developed. This study aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of this mHealth intervention in Chinese FDRs.
Methods
A single-blinded, family-based cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted. 20 families with CRC patients were randomized to intervention (10 families, n = 11) or control group (10 families, n = 10). Intervention consists of 3 sessions that provided tailored cancer and screening messages on response of personal assessment. All participants received an e-brochure on CRC and CRC screening. Feasibility was measured by recruitment and completion rate, whereas acceptability was assessed by a self-developed questionnaire.
Results
34.5% of eligible family members agreed to participate. 70% of participants completed the trial and all of them completed 3 sessions. All the participants satisfied with the intervention, and agreed the intervention help them understand their risks and appropriate screening recommendations. The main reason for low recruitment rate is that cancer cases were contacted through phone to identify FDRs. Even this is a common strategy when conducting family trials, it is difficult to obtain the trust of FDRs by phone due to the adverse influence of phone scam.
Conclusions
It is acceptable to provide mHealth intervention to Chinese FDRs. However, family recruitment utilizing cancer registry-identified cases seems less feasible in Chinese population. Recruitment through direct contact with FDRs is recommended, for example, through current screening program or clinical units. Furthermore, a definitive trial to test the effectiveness of developed intervention is warranted.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bai Yang.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3630 - Results of phase 1 clinical trial of high doses of Seleno-L-methionine (SLM) in sequential combination with Axitinib in previously treated and relapsed clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) patients
Presenter: Yousef Zakharia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2356 - Safety and Efficacy of CDX-014 , an Antibody-Drug Conjugate against T Cell immunoglobulin mucin-1 (TIM-1), in advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1028 - SPAZO2 (SOGUG): Outcomes and prognostic significance of IMDC intermediate prognosis subclassification in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in patients treated with 1st-line pazopanib (1stPz).
Presenter: Begona P. Valderrama
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2293 - Effect of Antacid Intake on the Therapeutic Efficacy of Sunitinib (SUN) in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Patients (pts): a Sub-Analysis of the STAR-TOR Registry
Presenter: Katrin Schlack
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1451 - Randomized phase 3 trial of avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: JAVELIN Renal 101 Japanese subgroup analysis
Presenter: Motohide Uemura
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4399 - Overall and progression-free survival according to MSKCC scores in 1st line sunitinib treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)
Presenter: Jindrich Finek
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1344 - Combination therapy with checkpoint inhibitors for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Presenter: Kyaw Thein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3462 - A phase II trial of TKI induction followed by a randomized comparison between nivolumab or TKI continuation in renal cell carcinoma (NIVOSWITCH)
Presenter: Viktor Grünwald
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5268 - Nivolumab (N) treatment beyond progression in a real-world cohort of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)
Presenter: Sophie Hans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4235 - First results of safety profile of nivolumab (NIVO) in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in II and III line of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in NIVES Study
Presenter: Cristina Masini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract