Abstract 857
Background
Colonoscopy is recommended as preferred test for first-degree relatives (FDRs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, colonoscopy screening rate remains low. A systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by the research team show that tailored communication is an effective approach to increase uptake of colonoscopy. However, the decision rules that guide the tailored process remain unclear. Based on the identified evidences, a mHealth intervention with an integrated tailoring decision system was developed. This study aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of this mHealth intervention in Chinese FDRs.
Methods
A single-blinded, family-based cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted. 20 families with CRC patients were randomized to intervention (10 families, n = 11) or control group (10 families, n = 10). Intervention consists of 3 sessions that provided tailored cancer and screening messages on response of personal assessment. All participants received an e-brochure on CRC and CRC screening. Feasibility was measured by recruitment and completion rate, whereas acceptability was assessed by a self-developed questionnaire.
Results
34.5% of eligible family members agreed to participate. 70% of participants completed the trial and all of them completed 3 sessions. All the participants satisfied with the intervention, and agreed the intervention help them understand their risks and appropriate screening recommendations. The main reason for low recruitment rate is that cancer cases were contacted through phone to identify FDRs. Even this is a common strategy when conducting family trials, it is difficult to obtain the trust of FDRs by phone due to the adverse influence of phone scam.
Conclusions
It is acceptable to provide mHealth intervention to Chinese FDRs. However, family recruitment utilizing cancer registry-identified cases seems less feasible in Chinese population. Recruitment through direct contact with FDRs is recommended, for example, through current screening program or clinical units. Furthermore, a definitive trial to test the effectiveness of developed intervention is warranted.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bai Yang.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract