Abstract 857
Background
Colonoscopy is recommended as preferred test for first-degree relatives (FDRs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, colonoscopy screening rate remains low. A systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by the research team show that tailored communication is an effective approach to increase uptake of colonoscopy. However, the decision rules that guide the tailored process remain unclear. Based on the identified evidences, a mHealth intervention with an integrated tailoring decision system was developed. This study aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of this mHealth intervention in Chinese FDRs.
Methods
A single-blinded, family-based cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted. 20 families with CRC patients were randomized to intervention (10 families, n = 11) or control group (10 families, n = 10). Intervention consists of 3 sessions that provided tailored cancer and screening messages on response of personal assessment. All participants received an e-brochure on CRC and CRC screening. Feasibility was measured by recruitment and completion rate, whereas acceptability was assessed by a self-developed questionnaire.
Results
34.5% of eligible family members agreed to participate. 70% of participants completed the trial and all of them completed 3 sessions. All the participants satisfied with the intervention, and agreed the intervention help them understand their risks and appropriate screening recommendations. The main reason for low recruitment rate is that cancer cases were contacted through phone to identify FDRs. Even this is a common strategy when conducting family trials, it is difficult to obtain the trust of FDRs by phone due to the adverse influence of phone scam.
Conclusions
It is acceptable to provide mHealth intervention to Chinese FDRs. However, family recruitment utilizing cancer registry-identified cases seems less feasible in Chinese population. Recruitment through direct contact with FDRs is recommended, for example, through current screening program or clinical units. Furthermore, a definitive trial to test the effectiveness of developed intervention is warranted.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bai Yang.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract