Abstract 5346
Background
Melanoma is the most aggressive of common skin cancers. We aimed to create a polygenic risk score (PRS) and evaluate its capability to predict melanoma prognosis better than staging.
Methods
The cohort included 1126 melanoma patients (567 males, 559 females); 57%, 24% and 19% patients stage I, II and III at diagnosis, respectively. The mean age at diagnosis was 54 yo (range 12-97). We genotyped 252 candidate SNPs by OpenArray. After quality control, we selected SNP associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) (log Rank P < 0.05), in the whole cohort and independently by sex. We performed cross-validation using 2/3 for training and 1/3 for validation. If the model was consistent in the three comparisons (concordance rate > 0.75), we created a PRS based on the weight of each SNP in MSS or DFS modulation. We compared the score including PRS and clinical data (age, sex, staging), with the clinical score alone or the staging score alone. ROC curves were calculated for each score to assess the capability to predict DFS and MSS.
Results
We identified 29 SNPs associated with DFS survival in the whole cohort. The score with PRS had a higher prediction capability (AUC 0.844), compared to clinical score (AUC 0.770) or staging alone (AUC 0.741). Male-specific analyses revealed 8 male-specific SNPs. The male-PRS improved also the prediction capability (AUC 0.831), compared to clinical (AUC 0.760) or staging alone score (AUC 0.735). Female-specific analyses revealed 21 female-specific SNPs. The female-PRS improved also the prediction capability (AUC 0.868), compared to clinical (AUC 0.767) or staging alone score (AUC 0.742). Using an optimal PRS + clinical score cut-off, we improved the classification of patients into low and high-risk groups within each stage and comparison (Table). Similar results were obtained regarding MSS.Table:
1366P 5-year DFS rate (%)
Sex | Stage | ALL | Low-risk group | High-risk group |
---|---|---|---|---|
ALL | I | 92.5 | 94.9 | 62.7 |
II | 69.7 | 87.7 | 50.6 | |
III | 59.3 | 90.2 | 50.3 | |
MALE | I | 91.4 | 92.0 | 80.0 |
II | 68.0 | 87.4 | 49.6 | |
III | 56.3 | 86.3 | 48.1 | |
FEMALE | I | 93.5 | 96.1 | 69.8 |
II | 72.2 | 94.1 | 47.9 | |
III | 62.6 | 94.1 | 42.7 |
Conclusions
We have identified a potential PRS that improves classification of melanoma patients within prognostic groups.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Instituto de Salud Carlos III.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3140 - Phase 2 study of olaparib in previously treated advanced solid tumors with homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm) or homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD): LYNK-002
Presenter: David Hyman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2655 - The K-BASKET trial: A prospective phase II biomarker-driven multiple basket trial in Korean solid cancer patients.
Presenter: Seul Kim
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5938 - Cambridge Liquid biopsy “CALIBRATION” study: Can changes in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) predict durable tumour responses in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer receiving MEDI4736?
Presenter: Constanza Linossi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3799 - Validation of a tumour mutational burden workflow on routine histological samples of colorectal cancer and assessment of a cohort with synchronous hepatic metastases
Presenter: Andrea Mafficini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4647 - Microsatellite Instability Testing and Lynch Syndrome Screening For Colorectal Cancer Patients Through Tumor Sequencing
Presenter: Li Liu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3231 - "Liquid Withdarw" technique in CT-guided cutting needle lung biopsy: decreased incidence of complications and increased tissue amount for lung cancer molecular testing.
Presenter: Xue Wang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3282 - WGS Implementation in standard cancer Diagnostics for Every cancer patient (WIDE)
Presenter: Paul Roepman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5905 - Known and unknown gene fusion detection capabilities of solid tumor laboratories conducting next generation sequencing in 6 countries
Presenter: Steph Finucane
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4238 - Clinical and Analytical Accuracy of a 523 Gene Panel Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Assay on Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Solid Tumor Samples
Presenter: Ina Deras
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2493 - Methylation analysis of MLH1 using droplet digital PCR and methylation sensitive restriction enzyme.
Presenter: Celine De Rop
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract