Abstract 920
Background
The antiemetic standard of care recommended by guidelines for prevention of CINV in patients receiving cisplatin- and AC-based CT is the combination of an NK1 RA, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone (DEX). An IV formulation of NEPA (fixed combination of the NK1 RA, fosnetupitant and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron) was recently approved in the US and is under review in Europe. Approval of IV NEPA was based on showing pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of IV fosnetupitant to oral netupitant and similar safety of IV NEPA to oral NEPA in a phase III study in patients receiving cisplatin-based CT. An IV/oral NEPA safety-controlled phase IIIb study was recently completed in patients receiving AC CT. In both studies, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA. This secondary analysis presents the efficacy of IV NEPA relative to that of oral NEPA and other NK1 RAs in cisplatin and AC settings.
Methods
Data is compiled from 5 pivotal NEPA studies in a total of 2077 adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors undergoing either cisplatin- or AC-based CT. IV NEPA was administered as a single 30-min infusion; oral NEPA was given as a single capsule 60 min prior to CT. Patients also received DEX. Data was also reviewed from 9 phase III cisplatin and AC studies with other NK1 RA (aprepitant [APR], fosaprepitant [FOS], rolapitant [ROL]) regimens. No emesis rates are summarized for the overall phase (0-120h) of the initial cycle of CT. No formal statistical comparisons were performed.
Results
The overall no emesis rates of > 80% for IV NEPA were similar to oral NEPA in both cisplatin and AC settings and were favorable in the context of historical NK1 RA regimens.Table:
1765P
Setting/Study | IV NEPA + DEX | Oral NEPA + DEX | APR + 5-HT3RA + DEX | FOS + 5-HT3RA + DEX | ROL + 5-HT3RA + DEX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisplatin | |||||
Schwartzberg 2018 | 84.2% | 88.6% | - | - | |
Hesketh 2014 | - | 91.1% | - | - | |
Zhang 2018 | - | 75.0% | - | - | |
Grunberg 2011 | - | - | 74.6% | 72.9% | |
Hesketh 2003 | - | - | 77.7% | - | - |
Poli-Bigelli 2003 | - | - | 66% | - | - |
Schmoll 2006 | - | - | 76.5% | - | - |
Saito 2013 | - | - | - | 67.6% | - |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-1) | - | - | - | - | 75% |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-2) | - | - | - | - | 71% |
AC | |||||
Schwartzberg 2019 | 82.5% | 86.1% | - | - | - |
Aapro 2014 | - | 79.8% | - | - | - |
Warr 2005 | - | - | 76% | - | - |
Schwartzberg 2016 | - | - | - | - | 72.4% |
Conclusions
Both IV and oral formulations of NEPA along with DEX represent highly effective guideline-compliant single-dose antiemetics.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03403712.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Vanden Burgt, Minneapolis, MN, funded by Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Helsinn Healthcare.
Funding
Helsinn Healthcare.
Disclosure
L. Schwartzberg: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck ; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron. M.S. Aapro: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare; Advisory / Consultancy: Mundipharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: G1 Therapeutics.
Resources from the same session
860 - Dose differential modulation of the autophagic behavior of estrogen expressing breast carcinoma cells
Presenter: Mariam Fouad
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2304 - Synthetic peptide of tumor–associated antigen L6 formulated with polymer-based adjuvant enhances anti-tumor effects in mice
Presenter: Shih-jen Liu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4419 - Improving detection level of somatic mosaicism in neurofibromatosis type 1
Presenter: Kristina Karandasheva
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5283 - Preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship of ABN401, a highly selective Met inhibitor, in gastric and non-small-cell lung cancer models
Presenter: JooSeok Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5488 - Transcription factors of Snail family in the regulation of resistance of breast cancer cells to hypoxic conditions
Presenter: Alvina Khamidullina
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5417 - Metastasis is impaired by endothelial-specific Dll4 loss-of-function through inhibition of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and reduction of cancer stem cells and circulating tumour cells
Presenter: Liliana Mendonça
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5494 - Identification of novel and known FGFR gene fusions in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Weixin Zhao
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3412 - WNT pathway mutations (APC/CTNNB1) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) response in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1815 - Leukocytosis as a negative prognostic factor in patients with lung cancer: Which subpopulation of leukocytes is responsible?
Presenter: Filip Kohutek
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5022 - Identification of MET gene amplifications using next-generation sequencing in non-small cell lung cancer patients
Presenter: Sergi Clavé
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract