Abstract 920
Background
The antiemetic standard of care recommended by guidelines for prevention of CINV in patients receiving cisplatin- and AC-based CT is the combination of an NK1 RA, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone (DEX). An IV formulation of NEPA (fixed combination of the NK1 RA, fosnetupitant and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron) was recently approved in the US and is under review in Europe. Approval of IV NEPA was based on showing pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of IV fosnetupitant to oral netupitant and similar safety of IV NEPA to oral NEPA in a phase III study in patients receiving cisplatin-based CT. An IV/oral NEPA safety-controlled phase IIIb study was recently completed in patients receiving AC CT. In both studies, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA. This secondary analysis presents the efficacy of IV NEPA relative to that of oral NEPA and other NK1 RAs in cisplatin and AC settings.
Methods
Data is compiled from 5 pivotal NEPA studies in a total of 2077 adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors undergoing either cisplatin- or AC-based CT. IV NEPA was administered as a single 30-min infusion; oral NEPA was given as a single capsule 60 min prior to CT. Patients also received DEX. Data was also reviewed from 9 phase III cisplatin and AC studies with other NK1 RA (aprepitant [APR], fosaprepitant [FOS], rolapitant [ROL]) regimens. No emesis rates are summarized for the overall phase (0-120h) of the initial cycle of CT. No formal statistical comparisons were performed.
Results
The overall no emesis rates of > 80% for IV NEPA were similar to oral NEPA in both cisplatin and AC settings and were favorable in the context of historical NK1 RA regimens.Table:
1765P
Setting/Study | IV NEPA + DEX | Oral NEPA + DEX | APR + 5-HT3RA + DEX | FOS + 5-HT3RA + DEX | ROL + 5-HT3RA + DEX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisplatin | |||||
Schwartzberg 2018 | 84.2% | 88.6% | - | - | |
Hesketh 2014 | - | 91.1% | - | - | |
Zhang 2018 | - | 75.0% | - | - | |
Grunberg 2011 | - | - | 74.6% | 72.9% | |
Hesketh 2003 | - | - | 77.7% | - | - |
Poli-Bigelli 2003 | - | - | 66% | - | - |
Schmoll 2006 | - | - | 76.5% | - | - |
Saito 2013 | - | - | - | 67.6% | - |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-1) | - | - | - | - | 75% |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-2) | - | - | - | - | 71% |
AC | |||||
Schwartzberg 2019 | 82.5% | 86.1% | - | - | - |
Aapro 2014 | - | 79.8% | - | - | - |
Warr 2005 | - | - | 76% | - | - |
Schwartzberg 2016 | - | - | - | - | 72.4% |
Conclusions
Both IV and oral formulations of NEPA along with DEX represent highly effective guideline-compliant single-dose antiemetics.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03403712.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Vanden Burgt, Minneapolis, MN, funded by Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Helsinn Healthcare.
Funding
Helsinn Healthcare.
Disclosure
L. Schwartzberg: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck ; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron. M.S. Aapro: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare; Advisory / Consultancy: Mundipharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: G1 Therapeutics.
Resources from the same session
3309 - Heat Shock Protein 90 chaperones and Protein Kinase D3 regulates androgen-independent prostate cancer development
Presenter: Attila Varga
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3441 - The SWI/SNF driven reprograming for the AR cistrome is NSD2 dependent
Presenter: Katia Ruggero
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1659 - IGF1R inhibition affects the survival of HT29 cancer cells by alterations of the TLR9- and autophagy signaling
Presenter: Györgyi Műzes
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1379 - Characterization of atypical dMMR (deficient MisMatch Repair) tumors: a study from a large cohort of 4948 cases
Presenter: Marion Jaffrelot
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1657 - Modulation of TLR9-dependent autophagy response via inhibition of c-Met signaling influences the survival of HT29 cancer cells
Presenter: Ferenc Sipos
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3045 - Positive Feedback Activation of Notch Signal by Obesity Enhances Colorectal Tumorigenicity
Presenter: Dake Chu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2285 - The Pathological and Functional Roles of BRPF1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Presenter: Lai Hung Carol Cheng
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3210 - Protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 3 (PTPN3) could be a new therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer.
Presenter: Akio Yamasaki
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3920 - A Novel bispecific BCMAxCD3 T cell engaging antibody that treat multiple myeloma (MM) with minimal cytokine serection
Presenter: Zhenyu Li
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2691 - Quantitative spatial profiling of lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3)/major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II) interaction in gastric and urothelial tumors
Presenter: Cyrus Hedvat
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract