Abstract 920
Background
The antiemetic standard of care recommended by guidelines for prevention of CINV in patients receiving cisplatin- and AC-based CT is the combination of an NK1 RA, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone (DEX). An IV formulation of NEPA (fixed combination of the NK1 RA, fosnetupitant and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron) was recently approved in the US and is under review in Europe. Approval of IV NEPA was based on showing pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of IV fosnetupitant to oral netupitant and similar safety of IV NEPA to oral NEPA in a phase III study in patients receiving cisplatin-based CT. An IV/oral NEPA safety-controlled phase IIIb study was recently completed in patients receiving AC CT. In both studies, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA. This secondary analysis presents the efficacy of IV NEPA relative to that of oral NEPA and other NK1 RAs in cisplatin and AC settings.
Methods
Data is compiled from 5 pivotal NEPA studies in a total of 2077 adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors undergoing either cisplatin- or AC-based CT. IV NEPA was administered as a single 30-min infusion; oral NEPA was given as a single capsule 60 min prior to CT. Patients also received DEX. Data was also reviewed from 9 phase III cisplatin and AC studies with other NK1 RA (aprepitant [APR], fosaprepitant [FOS], rolapitant [ROL]) regimens. No emesis rates are summarized for the overall phase (0-120h) of the initial cycle of CT. No formal statistical comparisons were performed.
Results
The overall no emesis rates of > 80% for IV NEPA were similar to oral NEPA in both cisplatin and AC settings and were favorable in the context of historical NK1 RA regimens.Table:
1765P
Setting/Study | IV NEPA + DEX | Oral NEPA + DEX | APR + 5-HT3RA + DEX | FOS + 5-HT3RA + DEX | ROL + 5-HT3RA + DEX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisplatin | |||||
Schwartzberg 2018 | 84.2% | 88.6% | - | - | |
Hesketh 2014 | - | 91.1% | - | - | |
Zhang 2018 | - | 75.0% | - | - | |
Grunberg 2011 | - | - | 74.6% | 72.9% | |
Hesketh 2003 | - | - | 77.7% | - | - |
Poli-Bigelli 2003 | - | - | 66% | - | - |
Schmoll 2006 | - | - | 76.5% | - | - |
Saito 2013 | - | - | - | 67.6% | - |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-1) | - | - | - | - | 75% |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-2) | - | - | - | - | 71% |
AC | |||||
Schwartzberg 2019 | 82.5% | 86.1% | - | - | - |
Aapro 2014 | - | 79.8% | - | - | - |
Warr 2005 | - | - | 76% | - | - |
Schwartzberg 2016 | - | - | - | - | 72.4% |
Conclusions
Both IV and oral formulations of NEPA along with DEX represent highly effective guideline-compliant single-dose antiemetics.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03403712.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Vanden Burgt, Minneapolis, MN, funded by Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Helsinn Healthcare.
Funding
Helsinn Healthcare.
Disclosure
L. Schwartzberg: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck ; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron. M.S. Aapro: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare; Advisory / Consultancy: Mundipharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: G1 Therapeutics.
Resources from the same session
4085 - A Phase 1, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Antitumor Activity of ADCT-601 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
Presenter: Anthony Tolcher
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1054 - Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of cosibelimab, an anti‐PD‐L1 antibody, in patients (pts) with advanced cancers
Presenter: Philip Clingan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4264 - A Phase I study of tinostamustine in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Alain Mita
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3811 - Lurbinectedin (LUR) in combination with Irinotecan (IRI) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Santiago Ponce Aix
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1311 - A phase I study of varlitinib (VAR; ASLAN001) an oral pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with mFOLFIRI chemotherapy in advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Aaron Tan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3482 - Phase I study of lapatinib and trametinib in patients with KRAS mutant colorectal, non-small cell lung and pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Sanne Huijberts
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4749 - Pharmacokinetic (PK) and updated survival data from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group IND.226 study of durvalumab ± tremelimumab in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy
Presenter: Desiree Hao
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4530 - A Phase 2a clinical trial combining ALRN-6924 and palbociclib for the treatment of patients with tumors harboring wild-type p53 and MDM2 amplification or MDM2/CDK4 co-amplification
Presenter: Funda Meric-Bernstam
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4280 - Updated Efficacy and Safety of Entrectinib in Patients with NTRK Fusion-Positive Tumors: Integrated Analysis of STARTRK-2, STARTRK-1 and ALKA-372-001
Presenter: Christian Rolfo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
6144 - An international randomized cross-over bio-equivalence study of oral paclitaxel + HM30181 compared with weekly intravenous (IV) paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Christopher Jackson
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract