Abstract 5619
Background
Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is a modified herpes simplex virus, type 1 (HSV-1), which can be administered intralesionally in patients with stage IIIB/C-IVM1a unresectable melanoma. When surgery is not a treatment option in the head and neck region, i.e. due to the location or the size of the tumor, T-VEC therapy can be an elegant alternative to systemic immunotherapy.
Methods
9 patients with melanoma in the head and neck region started treatment with T-VEC monotherapy at the Netherlands Cancer Institute, of which 4 are still currently on treatment. We collected data on response, adverse events (AE) and baseline characteristics. For response evaluation, we used clinical evaluation with photography, 3-monthly PET-CT’s and histological biopsies.
Results
Median age at baseline was 78.3 years. Of the 5 patients who stopped treatment, the median follow-up time was 9.1 months. Of these patients, 3 (60%) had a complete response (CR), 1 (20%) patient had a partial response (PR) and 1 (20%) patient showed progressive disease (PD) as their best response. ORR was 80%. Duration of response varies between 1.6-21.6 months. 2 patients developed distant metastases, 1 during T-VEC treatment and 1 after achieving a CR with a time to progression of 14.2 months. 4 patients are still on treatment today. Grade 1 AE’s occurred in all patients. Mostly, these consisted of fatigue, influenza-like symptoms and injection site pain. PET-CT and histological biopsies proved to be a clinically useful tool to evaluate treatment response for T-VEC monotherapy, confirming pCR or PD to stage IV disease requiring systemic treatment.
Conclusions
ORR for T-VEC monotherapy for melanoma in the head and neck region at our institute was 80% with 60% achieving a CR. This real world data on T-VEC monotherapy in stage IIIB/C-IVM1a unresectable melanoma of the head and neck region demonstrates interesting results and suggests T-VEC is an elegant alternative to systemic therapy in this select elderly and frail patient population.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
V. Franke: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): amgen. M.W.J.M. Wouters: Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis. W.J. van Houdt: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): amgen. A.C.J. van Akkooi: Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD-Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck-Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3973 - A randomized phase II study on the OPTimization of IMmunotherapy in squamous carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) – OPTIM (AIO-KHT-0117)
Presenter: Viktor Grünwald
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3489 - Overall Survival (OS) and Metastasis-Free Survival (MFS) in men with Biochemically Relapsed (BCR) Prostate Cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) managed with deferred Androgen Deprivation Treatment (ADT): A combined Johns Hopkins and CPDR study
Presenter: Catherine Marshall
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4606 - ARCHES – the role of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with enzalutamide (ENZA) or placebo (PBO) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): Post hoc analyses of high and low disease volume and risk groups
Presenter: Arnulf Stenzl
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2975 - Updated survival analyses of a multicentric phase II randomized trial of docetaxel (D) plus enzalutamide (E) versus docetaxel (D) as first line chemotherapy for patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) (CHEIRON study).
Presenter: Orazio Caffo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2708 - Real-world analysis of patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving vs not receiving chemotherapy in the treatment sequence
Presenter: Alicia Morgans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2134 - Baseline fracture risk in men with prostate cancer starting the STAMPEDE trial
Presenter: Janet Brown
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3504 - Risk of falls and fractures in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treated with new hormonal agents – a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Presenter: Rodrigo Coutinho Mariano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2342 - Pain progression at initiation of chemotherapy in metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) is associated with a poor prognosis: a post-hoc analysis of FIRSTANA
Presenter: Nicolas Delanoy
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5331 - Pain evaluation in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223 (Ra-223) in the PARABO observation study
Presenter: Holger Palmedo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2823 - Time to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and the risk of developing immune disorders
Presenter: Vincenza Conteduca
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract