Abstract 5619
Background
Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is a modified herpes simplex virus, type 1 (HSV-1), which can be administered intralesionally in patients with stage IIIB/C-IVM1a unresectable melanoma. When surgery is not a treatment option in the head and neck region, i.e. due to the location or the size of the tumor, T-VEC therapy can be an elegant alternative to systemic immunotherapy.
Methods
9 patients with melanoma in the head and neck region started treatment with T-VEC monotherapy at the Netherlands Cancer Institute, of which 4 are still currently on treatment. We collected data on response, adverse events (AE) and baseline characteristics. For response evaluation, we used clinical evaluation with photography, 3-monthly PET-CT’s and histological biopsies.
Results
Median age at baseline was 78.3 years. Of the 5 patients who stopped treatment, the median follow-up time was 9.1 months. Of these patients, 3 (60%) had a complete response (CR), 1 (20%) patient had a partial response (PR) and 1 (20%) patient showed progressive disease (PD) as their best response. ORR was 80%. Duration of response varies between 1.6-21.6 months. 2 patients developed distant metastases, 1 during T-VEC treatment and 1 after achieving a CR with a time to progression of 14.2 months. 4 patients are still on treatment today. Grade 1 AE’s occurred in all patients. Mostly, these consisted of fatigue, influenza-like symptoms and injection site pain. PET-CT and histological biopsies proved to be a clinically useful tool to evaluate treatment response for T-VEC monotherapy, confirming pCR or PD to stage IV disease requiring systemic treatment.
Conclusions
ORR for T-VEC monotherapy for melanoma in the head and neck region at our institute was 80% with 60% achieving a CR. This real world data on T-VEC monotherapy in stage IIIB/C-IVM1a unresectable melanoma of the head and neck region demonstrates interesting results and suggests T-VEC is an elegant alternative to systemic therapy in this select elderly and frail patient population.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
V. Franke: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): amgen. M.W.J.M. Wouters: Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis. W.J. van Houdt: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): amgen. A.C.J. van Akkooi: Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD-Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck-Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5520 - Patient’s Usability Test results of a CINV Diary Application For Smartphones
Presenter: Paz Fernandez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2323 - Colorectal Telephone Assessment Pathway (CTAP) - A viable means of shortening time to a definitive diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Presenter: Harriet Watson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6119 - Cancer Nursing and Social Media: Capturing the Zeitgeist
Presenter: Mark Foulkes
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1776 - Examination of mobile applications on breast cancer
Presenter: AYDANUR AYDIN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4128 - E-health effectiveness to increase patient adherence for immunotherapy; a cost-benefit study.
Presenter: Maria José Dias
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3219 - Experiences of internet-based stepped care among individuals with recently diagnosed cancer and symptoms of anxiety and/or depression
Presenter: Anna Hauffman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5010 - What do cancer patients know about their immunotherapy treatment?
Presenter: Mónica Arellano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4503 - Prospective Comparison of Travel Burden, Cost and Time to Obtain Tumor Board Treatment Plan Through In-Person Visits vs. an AI Enabled Health Technology (N=1803)
Presenter: Rajendra Badwe
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4123 - Cancer care through the fire and flames: 3-year experience in the utilisation of electronic consultation and referral system at the Red Zone in Southern Thailand
Presenter: Nanthiya Rattanakhot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2087 - The effect of e-mobile education on the quality of life in women with breast cancer
Presenter: Derya ÇInar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract