Abstract 5101
Background
Recent reports suggested gaps in knowledge and misperceptions regarding lung cancer (LC) in the general public and physicians respectively. We aimed to further investigate the topic.
Methods
From February 21st to March 22nd, 2019, two online surveys were led in parallel among French people (n = 6001) and physicians (GP, n = 273; pulmonologists, n = 97; oncologists, n = 67). Questions aimed to assess people’s knowledge about LC prevalence, severity, diagnosis, management and treatments, early screening, as well of social stigma, and also understandings from physicians about public perception.
Results
LC was ranked as the 2nd most feared cancer (n = 1980; 33%) and perceived as very or extremely serious by 96% of people (n = 5760). Half of French people (n = 3360) declared knowing at least one other risk factor than tobacco, and except for asbestos (n = 5220; 87%), other potential risk factors were subjects to low to moderate levels of belief. The general population ranked LC as the 3rd easiest cancer to diagnose among French people (n = 2220; 37%) and 57% (n = 3420) believed that diagnosis was made early after symptoms onset. The general population was not aware of the majority of the symptoms beside blood in the sputum and respiratory symptoms. LC was ranked only the 5th cancer (n = 1260; 21%) among those for which medical progress had been the most substantial, whereas physicians ranked it second (n = 201; 46%). Also the public was not aware of therapeutic progress as immunotherapy. Physicians tended to be more optimistic about actual treatment improvement than the public and for 90% of them (n = 393), systematic screening of at-risk population would have a significant impact on mortality data by LC.
Conclusions
Our study confirms the substantial gaps in LC knowledge from the general public and highlights several venues for improvement of communication and public awareness on LC in France.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
AstraZeneca.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
J. Cadranel: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Boerhinger Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Takeda. C. Chouaid: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: GSK; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi Aventis; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen. J.B. Stern: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Fees for presentation in a Medtronic symposium which were donated to our association.: Medtronic. A. Vergnenegre: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Teva; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Clovis Oncology. C. Cortot: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. L. Guery: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. K. Belkhiria: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. I. De la Porte: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. M. Urbieta: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. M. Perol: Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5517 - Molecular fingerprinting in breast cancer (BC) screening using Quantum Optics (QO) technology combined with an artificial intelligence (AI) approach applying the concept of “molecular profiles at n variables (MPnV)”: a prospective pilot study.
Presenter: Jean-Marc Nabholtz
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2152 - Inferring the correlation between incidence rates of melanoma and the average tumor-specific epitope binding ability of HLA class I molecules in different populations
Presenter: Istvan Miklos
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4382 - Thermal Liquid Biopsy as a Valuable Tool in Lung Cancer Screening Programs
Presenter: Alberto Rodrigo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2465 - Towards a screening test for cancer by circulating DNA analysis
Presenter: Rita Tanos
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3788 - Evaluation of a successful launch of the MammaPrint and BluePrint NGS kit
Presenter: Leonie Delahaye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3863 - Analysis of prognostic factors on overall survival in elderly women treated for early breast cancer using data mining and machine learning
Presenter: Pierre Heudel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1993 - Circulating tumor cell detection in epithelial ovarian cancer using dual-component antibodies targeting EpCAM and FRα
Presenter: Na Li
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4281 - CEUS of the breast: Is it feasible in improved performance of BI-RADS evaluation of critical breast lesions?——A multi-center prospective study in China
Presenter: Jun Luo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2268 - Classification of abnormal findings on ring-type dedicated breast PET for detecting breast cancer
Presenter: Shinsuke Sasada
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4035 - Prediction of benign and malignant breast masses using digital mammograms texture features
Presenter: Cui Yanhua
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract