Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session 3

3788 - Evaluation of a successful launch of the MammaPrint and BluePrint NGS kit

Date

30 Sep 2019

Session

Poster Display session 3

Topics

Translational Research

Tumour Site

Presenters

Leonie Delahaye

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_5): v574-v584. 10.1093/annonc/mdz257

Authors

L. Delahaye1, A.T. Witteveen1, M. Snel1, T. Cavness2, B. Chan3, L. Mittempergher1, A.M. Glas1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Product Development, Agendia Inc., 1098 XH - Amsterdam/NL
  • 2 Operations, Agendia Inc., 92618 - Irvine/US
  • 3 Product Support, Agendia Inc., 92618 - Irvine/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 3788

Background

Centralized MammaPrint (MP) and BluePrint (BP) microarray-based genomic tests on FFPE RNA were succesfully translated to a targeted RNA NGS kit that can be performed locally in decentralized sites. Since the launch of the CE-marked MP and BP NGS test, more data has been generated on this platform as well as on the established FDA-cleared microarray platform. Furthermore, decentralized sites worldwide have been onboarded and are certified to locally run the MP and BP NGS test.

Methods

Paired MP and BP results were generated from FFPE RNA samples using the standard microarray as well as the MP and BP NGS test. The results from both platforms were compared to assess the concordance. Since the launch of the MP and BP NGS kit several decentralized sites underwent the onboarding process. As part of the onboarding, these sites processed a set of RNA and FFPE tissue samples previously processed at Agendia using the MP and BP NGS test. A site could only be certified if NGS results showed a 100% concordance with the Agendia results.

Results

To date, over 150 RNA FFPE samples were processed with both microarray and NGS tests and MP/BP results showed concordance above 97%. Onboarding results were available for the decentralized sites. The FASTQ files generated at the sites were uploaded into the cloud-based Agendia Data Analysis Pipeline Tool (ADAPT) to generate MP and BP results. Results showed 100% concordance between Agendia’s central laboratory and the decentralized laboratories.

Conclusions

MP and BP NGS test delivers equivalent results to the standard microarray test. Additionally, NGS results generated at decentralized sites also show extremely high concordance. These results confirm the high quality and robustness of the MP and BP NGS test.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

L. Delahaye: Full / Part-time employment: Agendia. A.T. Witteveen: Full / Part-time employment: Agendia. M. Snel: Full / Part-time employment: Agendia. T. Cavness: Full / Part-time employment: Agendia. B. Chan: Full / Part-time employment: Agendia. L. Mittempergher: Full / Part-time employment: Agendia. A.M. Glas: Full / Part-time employment: Agendia.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.