Abstract 4370
Background
In the multi-center investigator-initiated OpACIN-neo trial, patients (pts) with macroscopic stage III melanoma were randomized (stratified by center) to 3 different dosing schemes of neoadjuvant (neoadj) IPI+NIVO. Two cycles IPI 1mg/kg + NIVO3 mg/kg was identified as the most favorable regimen with 20% grade 3-4 adverse events and a pathological response rate (pRR) of 77%. After a median follow-up (FU) of 8.3 months (mo) none (0/86) of the pts with a pathologic (path) response had relapsed, while 9/21 (43%) without a path response relapsed. Post-hoc analyses were conducted to investigate potential differences between pts treated in Europe (EU) and in Australia (AUS).
Methods
Baseline patient characteristics, safety and efficacy in terms of path response were evaluated in pts treated in EU (n = 48) and AUS (n = 38). Multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression method. Median FU was 9.3mo for EU pts and 6.9mo for AUS pts.
Results
Baseline characteristics (AUS vs EU) differed in age (median 60 vs 53 year [yr], p = 0.017) and AUS pts were more likely to be male (65.8 vs 50.0%, p = 0.142) and have an unknown primary melanoma (36.8 vs 20.8%, p = 0.100); no difference in PD-L1 expression was observed. There was a trend to a higher pRR for AUS pts than for EU pts (84.2% vs 68.1%, OR 2.50, p = 0.092). pRR was also higher for pts >60 yr compared to £60 yr (91.2% vs 64.7%, OR 5.64, p = 0.010) and males vs females (83.7% vs 63.9%, OR 2.90, p = 0.041). Multivariate analysis including continent, age and gender showed an adjusted OR for path response of 1.85 (p = 0.289) for AUS vs EU pts, an OR of 4.89 (p = 0.021) for pts >60yrs vs £60yrs and an OR of 2.50 (p = 0.095) for males vs females. The frequency of high grade toxicity was the same in pts <60 compared to pts >60 yr (42.3% vs 32.4%, p = 0.353).
Conclusions
The continental difference in path response appears mostly driven by differences in age and gender. It remains to be elucidated whether the higher pRRs in elderly pts and pts from AUS can be explained by differences in mutational burden (analysis in progress and will be presented). Our data also indicate that neoadj IPI+NIVO is safe and highly effective in the elderly.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02977052.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Netherlands Cancer Institute.
Funding
BMS.
Disclosure
E.A. Rozeman: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: NanoString. A.M. Menzies: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. R.A. Scolyer: Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Neracare; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. A.C.J. van Akkooi: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck-Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: 4SC. J. Hansson: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. G.V. Long: Advisory / Consultancy: Aduro; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Mass-Array; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche. C.U. Blank: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: GSK; Advisory / Consultancy: GenMab; Research grant / Funding (institution): NanoString. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5007 - Functional systemic CD4 immunity is required for clinical responses to PD-L1/PD-1 blockade therapy
Presenter: Miren Zuazo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5760 - Landscape of PD-L1 expression status in Chinese solid tumor patients.
Presenter: Yi Zhong
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3733 - Anti-cancer and immunomodulatory effects of cobimetinib in triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Chun-Yu Liu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4426 - Differential expression of immunoregulatory molecules and highly-associated cancer genes may provide novel insights into strategic trial design for therapeutics
Presenter: Jacob Adashek
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2752 - Insights into the Tumor Immune Microenvironment using Tissue Phenomics to Drive Cancer Immunotherapy
Presenter: Martin Groher
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5713 - Immune competent somatic mosaic model of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Stefania Napolitano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1898 - Genomic correlates of response to anti-PDL1 Atezolizumab in non-small-cell lung cancer OAK and POPLAR trials
Presenter: Hari Singhal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3246 - Erdafitinib (erda) versus available therapies in advanced urothelial cancer: A matching adjusted indirect comparison
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3311 - High level of activity of Nivolumab anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and favorable outcome in metastatic/refractory MSI-H non-colorectal cancer: Results of the MSI cohort from the French AcSé program
Presenter: Christophe Tournigand
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2314 - TP53 and ATM Co-mutation Predicts Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Presenter: Yu Chen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract