Abstract 3280
Background
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading cancer with the 55% survival rate. The analysis of tumor microenviroment in fresh surgical samples by flow cytometry focuses on the presence of immune cells. However, no direct access to fresh tumor sample is always possible. Moreover, transport of interesting fresh tumor tissue specimens to distant labs is sometimes neccesary. Therefore, we analyzed both fresh and frozen cells isolated from tumor tissue, stored in hibernation buffer for 1 to 3 days and compared the percentage of EpCAM+, CD45+ and CD3+ cells. We analyzed 26 surgical samples of primary CRC and metastatic samples.
Methods
Surgical samples were obtained from patients with CRC and processed for an isolation of a single cell suspension (SCS) prepared using standard protocol with collagenase. After washing and blocking with mouse serum, cells were stained with fluorescently labeled antibodies (EpCAM-PE, CD45-FITC, CD3-APC). The cells were phenotyped using the FACS ARIAII instrument. Samples were obtained from freshly prepared (n = 19) and frozen cells, stored in DMSO supplemented medium (n = 8). 1 sample was phenotyped both from freshly prepared and frozen cells.
Results
From freshly prepared SCS, the average amount of EpCAM+ and CD45+ cells was 78.7% and 14.7%, respectively. In 12 out of 19 cases we also used anti CD3 antibodies. 2% of infiltrated cells were found to be positive for CD3. When using frozen SCS, we detected a higher positivity for EpCAM (92.85%), CD45 (62%) and CD3 (6%) compared to freshly prepared SCS.
Conclusions
We phenotyped human CRC samples for EpCAM, CD45 and some samples for CD3 marker. We found that for the FACS analysis, the stability of tumor tissue samples seems to be acceptable for isolation of SCS from CRC if stored in hibernation buffer, at 4 °C for 1 to 3 days. When isolated SCS from frozen stocks were used, we detected higher percentages of positive cells for EpCAM, CD45, CD3 markers. Therefore, we do not recommend to compare freshly isolated cells with previously frozen cells in FACS experiments.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
grants APVV (no.16–0066), VEGA (no. 1/0380/18).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract