Abstract 3280
Background
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading cancer with the 55% survival rate. The analysis of tumor microenviroment in fresh surgical samples by flow cytometry focuses on the presence of immune cells. However, no direct access to fresh tumor sample is always possible. Moreover, transport of interesting fresh tumor tissue specimens to distant labs is sometimes neccesary. Therefore, we analyzed both fresh and frozen cells isolated from tumor tissue, stored in hibernation buffer for 1 to 3 days and compared the percentage of EpCAM+, CD45+ and CD3+ cells. We analyzed 26 surgical samples of primary CRC and metastatic samples.
Methods
Surgical samples were obtained from patients with CRC and processed for an isolation of a single cell suspension (SCS) prepared using standard protocol with collagenase. After washing and blocking with mouse serum, cells were stained with fluorescently labeled antibodies (EpCAM-PE, CD45-FITC, CD3-APC). The cells were phenotyped using the FACS ARIAII instrument. Samples were obtained from freshly prepared (n = 19) and frozen cells, stored in DMSO supplemented medium (n = 8). 1 sample was phenotyped both from freshly prepared and frozen cells.
Results
From freshly prepared SCS, the average amount of EpCAM+ and CD45+ cells was 78.7% and 14.7%, respectively. In 12 out of 19 cases we also used anti CD3 antibodies. 2% of infiltrated cells were found to be positive for CD3. When using frozen SCS, we detected a higher positivity for EpCAM (92.85%), CD45 (62%) and CD3 (6%) compared to freshly prepared SCS.
Conclusions
We phenotyped human CRC samples for EpCAM, CD45 and some samples for CD3 marker. We found that for the FACS analysis, the stability of tumor tissue samples seems to be acceptable for isolation of SCS from CRC if stored in hibernation buffer, at 4 °C for 1 to 3 days. When isolated SCS from frozen stocks were used, we detected higher percentages of positive cells for EpCAM, CD45, CD3 markers. Therefore, we do not recommend to compare freshly isolated cells with previously frozen cells in FACS experiments.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
grants APVV (no.16–0066), VEGA (no. 1/0380/18).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract