Abstract 1087
Background
Several lines of evidence suggest that the gut microbiome represents a novel biomarker in the era of immuno-oncology. Therefore, the prospective collection of fecal samples is now routinely included in clinical trials and acts as a new challenge for research nurses. However, little is known about patient compliance in the collection process. The objective of this study was to assess enrolment and compliance rates for fecal sample collection.
Methods
Fecal samples were prospectively collected in two academic institutions, University of Montreal Hospital and Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, using the International Human Microbiome Standards SOP Version 3 in the following groups: (1) patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) amenable to immune checkpoint inhibitors and (2) patients with early-stage NSCLC or renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at a pre-operative stage. Informed and written consent were obtained by research nurses and patient baseline characteristics were collected. Upon consent, a white opaque polypropylene pot with an anaerobic generator bag was provided to the patient, along with a document to explain the self-collection technique. Enrolment (signing of consent) and compliance (returning the sample) rates were analysed using a Chi-squared method.
Results
A total of 267 patients were eligible for the study and 252 (94%) patients with a median age of 64 agreed to sign the consent form. The enrolment rate in the study reached 96% (175/183) in patients receiving immunotherapy compared to 92% (77/84) in patients with early stage cancers undergoing surgical resection who did not receive immunotherapy (p = 0.01). Overall patient compliance was 81% (204/252). Importantly, compliance was significantly higher in the pre-immunotherapy setting (94%, 164/175) versus the pre-operative group (52%, 40/77) (p = 0.01). Furthermore, regardless of the cancer stage, women (82% or 77 patients) were more compliant than men (80% or 127 patients) (p = 0.02).
Conclusions
New tools to increase compliance and assist patients in sample collection should be developed, especially for male patients diagnosed with early stage disease who are undergoing surgery.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bertrand Routy.
Funding
Montreal Cancer Institute.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3630 - Results of phase 1 clinical trial of high doses of Seleno-L-methionine (SLM) in sequential combination with Axitinib in previously treated and relapsed clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) patients
Presenter: Yousef Zakharia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2356 - Safety and Efficacy of CDX-014 , an Antibody-Drug Conjugate against T Cell immunoglobulin mucin-1 (TIM-1), in advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1028 - SPAZO2 (SOGUG): Outcomes and prognostic significance of IMDC intermediate prognosis subclassification in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in patients treated with 1st-line pazopanib (1stPz).
Presenter: Begona P. Valderrama
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2293 - Effect of Antacid Intake on the Therapeutic Efficacy of Sunitinib (SUN) in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Patients (pts): a Sub-Analysis of the STAR-TOR Registry
Presenter: Katrin Schlack
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1451 - Randomized phase 3 trial of avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: JAVELIN Renal 101 Japanese subgroup analysis
Presenter: Motohide Uemura
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4399 - Overall and progression-free survival according to MSKCC scores in 1st line sunitinib treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)
Presenter: Jindrich Finek
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1344 - Combination therapy with checkpoint inhibitors for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Presenter: Kyaw Thein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3462 - A phase II trial of TKI induction followed by a randomized comparison between nivolumab or TKI continuation in renal cell carcinoma (NIVOSWITCH)
Presenter: Viktor Grünwald
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5268 - Nivolumab (N) treatment beyond progression in a real-world cohort of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)
Presenter: Sophie Hans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4235 - First results of safety profile of nivolumab (NIVO) in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in II and III line of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in NIVES Study
Presenter: Cristina Masini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract