Abstract 1087
Background
Several lines of evidence suggest that the gut microbiome represents a novel biomarker in the era of immuno-oncology. Therefore, the prospective collection of fecal samples is now routinely included in clinical trials and acts as a new challenge for research nurses. However, little is known about patient compliance in the collection process. The objective of this study was to assess enrolment and compliance rates for fecal sample collection.
Methods
Fecal samples were prospectively collected in two academic institutions, University of Montreal Hospital and Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, using the International Human Microbiome Standards SOP Version 3 in the following groups: (1) patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) amenable to immune checkpoint inhibitors and (2) patients with early-stage NSCLC or renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at a pre-operative stage. Informed and written consent were obtained by research nurses and patient baseline characteristics were collected. Upon consent, a white opaque polypropylene pot with an anaerobic generator bag was provided to the patient, along with a document to explain the self-collection technique. Enrolment (signing of consent) and compliance (returning the sample) rates were analysed using a Chi-squared method.
Results
A total of 267 patients were eligible for the study and 252 (94%) patients with a median age of 64 agreed to sign the consent form. The enrolment rate in the study reached 96% (175/183) in patients receiving immunotherapy compared to 92% (77/84) in patients with early stage cancers undergoing surgical resection who did not receive immunotherapy (p = 0.01). Overall patient compliance was 81% (204/252). Importantly, compliance was significantly higher in the pre-immunotherapy setting (94%, 164/175) versus the pre-operative group (52%, 40/77) (p = 0.01). Furthermore, regardless of the cancer stage, women (82% or 77 patients) were more compliant than men (80% or 127 patients) (p = 0.02).
Conclusions
New tools to increase compliance and assist patients in sample collection should be developed, especially for male patients diagnosed with early stage disease who are undergoing surgery.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bertrand Routy.
Funding
Montreal Cancer Institute.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4370 - Continental differences in pathologic response with neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) plus nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma in the phase 2 OpACIN-neo trial.
Presenter: Irene Reijers
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3230 - Comparable responses of melanoma at primary site and synchronous lymph node metastases upon neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO)
Presenter: Judith Versluis
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3171 - Adjuvant Therapies for Stage III Melanoma: Benchmarks for Bringing Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice
Presenter: Tina HIEKEN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3493 - Mixture-cure modeling for resected stage III/IV melanoma in the phase 3 CheckMate 238 trial
Presenter: Jeffrey Weber
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3036 - An open-label, non-randomized, phase IIIb study of trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for patients with unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: a subgroup analysis of patients with brain metastasis
Presenter: Caroline Dutriaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2233 - Adverse event (AE) kinetics in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib + trametinib (D + T) in the metastatic and adjuvant setting
Presenter: Jean Jacques Grob
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2435 - A Single Arm, Open Label, Phase II, Multicenter Study to Assess the Detection of the BRAF V600 Mutation on cfDNA from Plasma in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1766 - Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAFV600 Mutation-positive Melanoma in the Real-World Setting – Interim results of the non-interventional COMBI-r study
Presenter: Carola Berking
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2131 - Trial update: A randomized Phase Ib/II study of the selective small molecule Axl inhibitor Bemcentinib (BGB324) in combination with either dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) or pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma
Presenter: Oddbjørn Straume
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4074 - Analysis of pyrexia in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib (D) and/or trametinib (T) across clinical trials
Presenter: Caroline Robert
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract