Abstract 1087
Background
Several lines of evidence suggest that the gut microbiome represents a novel biomarker in the era of immuno-oncology. Therefore, the prospective collection of fecal samples is now routinely included in clinical trials and acts as a new challenge for research nurses. However, little is known about patient compliance in the collection process. The objective of this study was to assess enrolment and compliance rates for fecal sample collection.
Methods
Fecal samples were prospectively collected in two academic institutions, University of Montreal Hospital and Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, using the International Human Microbiome Standards SOP Version 3 in the following groups: (1) patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) amenable to immune checkpoint inhibitors and (2) patients with early-stage NSCLC or renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at a pre-operative stage. Informed and written consent were obtained by research nurses and patient baseline characteristics were collected. Upon consent, a white opaque polypropylene pot with an anaerobic generator bag was provided to the patient, along with a document to explain the self-collection technique. Enrolment (signing of consent) and compliance (returning the sample) rates were analysed using a Chi-squared method.
Results
A total of 267 patients were eligible for the study and 252 (94%) patients with a median age of 64 agreed to sign the consent form. The enrolment rate in the study reached 96% (175/183) in patients receiving immunotherapy compared to 92% (77/84) in patients with early stage cancers undergoing surgical resection who did not receive immunotherapy (p = 0.01). Overall patient compliance was 81% (204/252). Importantly, compliance was significantly higher in the pre-immunotherapy setting (94%, 164/175) versus the pre-operative group (52%, 40/77) (p = 0.01). Furthermore, regardless of the cancer stage, women (82% or 77 patients) were more compliant than men (80% or 127 patients) (p = 0.02).
Conclusions
New tools to increase compliance and assist patients in sample collection should be developed, especially for male patients diagnosed with early stage disease who are undergoing surgery.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bertrand Routy.
Funding
Montreal Cancer Institute.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract