Abstract 2594
Background
Identifying low risk of disease recurrence in localised ccRCC is key for gatekeeping in the adjuvant therapy enrolment. Uncertainty increases the number of patients required for accrual to achieve statistical power. Current scoring systems are good at identifying very low and very high risk cohorts, but have not been proved to be as effective at accurately predicting disease recurrence in intermediate groups. These patients are perhaps those likely to benefit from intervention in addition to surgery, but many may be treated unnecessarily. Using digital pathology, image analysis and machine learning we sought to stratify for risk in this intermediate category.
Methods
Definiens Tissue studio and Developer XD were utilised for object thresholding to measure tumour cell nuclear morphological features on H&E digitised images from 120 ccRCC training set from UK and 217 ccRCC validation set from Singapore. Multiplexed immunofluorescence (mIF) was performed on 120 cases to co-detect neo-vasculature and pan-T cells. An algorithm was derived to measure spatial relationships between blood vessels and T cells. A statistical model was developed by generalised linear model with spatially adaptive local smoothing algorithm, having specificity prefixed (0.8-1) plus cross validation.
Results
Replacing manual nuclear grade with AI aided tumour cell nuclear morphological features improved the specificity of Leibovich score (LS) from 0.76 to 0.86 and from 0.84 to 0.94 in training and validation sets, respectively. Moreover, tumour microenvironment (TM) parameters significantly improved the specificity up to 0.93 in the training set. The negative predictive values of both LS 5 and 6 were zero, but by applying the algorithm the specificity for LS 5 and 6 cases became 0.93 and 0.40 respectively.
Conclusions
By applying image analysis it is possible to identify lower risk for recurrence patients in a conventionally identified intermediate risk group based on routine ccRCC H&E images, and multiplexed TM features. This approach to pathology should help refine selection of patients for clinical trials and form the basis of future AI-enabled prognostic and predictive algorithms in ccRCC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Authors.
Funding
Renal Cancer Research Fund and NHS Lothian.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3140 - Phase 2 study of olaparib in previously treated advanced solid tumors with homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm) or homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD): LYNK-002
Presenter: David Hyman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2655 - The K-BASKET trial: A prospective phase II biomarker-driven multiple basket trial in Korean solid cancer patients.
Presenter: Seul Kim
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5938 - Cambridge Liquid biopsy “CALIBRATION” study: Can changes in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) predict durable tumour responses in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer receiving MEDI4736?
Presenter: Constanza Linossi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3799 - Validation of a tumour mutational burden workflow on routine histological samples of colorectal cancer and assessment of a cohort with synchronous hepatic metastases
Presenter: Andrea Mafficini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4647 - Microsatellite Instability Testing and Lynch Syndrome Screening For Colorectal Cancer Patients Through Tumor Sequencing
Presenter: Li Liu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3231 - "Liquid Withdarw" technique in CT-guided cutting needle lung biopsy: decreased incidence of complications and increased tissue amount for lung cancer molecular testing.
Presenter: Xue Wang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3282 - WGS Implementation in standard cancer Diagnostics for Every cancer patient (WIDE)
Presenter: Paul Roepman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5905 - Known and unknown gene fusion detection capabilities of solid tumor laboratories conducting next generation sequencing in 6 countries
Presenter: Steph Finucane
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4238 - Clinical and Analytical Accuracy of a 523 Gene Panel Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Assay on Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Solid Tumor Samples
Presenter: Ina Deras
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2493 - Methylation analysis of MLH1 using droplet digital PCR and methylation sensitive restriction enzyme.
Presenter: Celine De Rop
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract