Abstract 1995
Background
Anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapies have become the standard of care for metastatic melanoma. However, the majority of patients develop resistance to therapy. Macrophages are abundant cells in tumours, but their role in immunotherapy response and resistance is largely unknown. This study investigated the role of macrophages in anti-PD-1 +/- CTLA-4 response in stage IV melanoma patients.
Methods
Transcriptomic and multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) immune profiling were performed on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue pre-treatment biopsies from advanced melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 (n = 19) or anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4 (n = 10). Response and progression-free survival were assessed using RECIST criteria. Using tumour dissociates, mass cytometry was used to characterize macrophages in detail.
Results
Although there was no significant difference in CD68+ macrophages between responding and non-responding patients, responding patients had a significantly higher intratumoral density of CD14+ CD68+ CD16+ macrophages compared to non-responders at baseline (median= 192 versus 23; p = 0.006). Using mIHC, patients were classified into high/low CD16+ macrophages and differential RNA expression analysis was performed. CD16+ high macrophage tumours displayed increased expression of genes related to T cell activation (TIGIT, LAG3, ICOS, PDCD1, FASLG and TBX21), MHC class I presentation (TAP1, UBD, PSMB10 and B2M) and chemokine + cytokine activity (CXCL13, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL9, CXCR6 and CXCR3). Using mass cytometry, we determined that CD16+ macrophages are CD13+ HLA-DR+, ICOS+ CD86+/- LAG3- GITR- TIGIT-. Multivariate analysis showed that low LDH, low melanoma substage and the presence of high CD16+ macrophages were associated with a significantly better overall response rate (OR = 14; p = 0.011) and progression free survival (HR = 0.15; p = 0.016), but not overall survival (HR = 0.22; p = 0.068).
Conclusions
Presence of CD68+ CD14+ CD16+ macrophages in pre-treatment melanoma combined with low LDH and low melanoma substage strongly correlates with response and survival of advanced melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
James Wilmott.
Funding
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC).
Disclosure
M.S. Carlino: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. A.M. Menzies: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. G.V. Long: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Array; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract