Abstract 1995
Background
Anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapies have become the standard of care for metastatic melanoma. However, the majority of patients develop resistance to therapy. Macrophages are abundant cells in tumours, but their role in immunotherapy response and resistance is largely unknown. This study investigated the role of macrophages in anti-PD-1 +/- CTLA-4 response in stage IV melanoma patients.
Methods
Transcriptomic and multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) immune profiling were performed on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue pre-treatment biopsies from advanced melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 (n = 19) or anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4 (n = 10). Response and progression-free survival were assessed using RECIST criteria. Using tumour dissociates, mass cytometry was used to characterize macrophages in detail.
Results
Although there was no significant difference in CD68+ macrophages between responding and non-responding patients, responding patients had a significantly higher intratumoral density of CD14+ CD68+ CD16+ macrophages compared to non-responders at baseline (median= 192 versus 23; p = 0.006). Using mIHC, patients were classified into high/low CD16+ macrophages and differential RNA expression analysis was performed. CD16+ high macrophage tumours displayed increased expression of genes related to T cell activation (TIGIT, LAG3, ICOS, PDCD1, FASLG and TBX21), MHC class I presentation (TAP1, UBD, PSMB10 and B2M) and chemokine + cytokine activity (CXCL13, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL9, CXCR6 and CXCR3). Using mass cytometry, we determined that CD16+ macrophages are CD13+ HLA-DR+, ICOS+ CD86+/- LAG3- GITR- TIGIT-. Multivariate analysis showed that low LDH, low melanoma substage and the presence of high CD16+ macrophages were associated with a significantly better overall response rate (OR = 14; p = 0.011) and progression free survival (HR = 0.15; p = 0.016), but not overall survival (HR = 0.22; p = 0.068).
Conclusions
Presence of CD68+ CD14+ CD16+ macrophages in pre-treatment melanoma combined with low LDH and low melanoma substage strongly correlates with response and survival of advanced melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
James Wilmott.
Funding
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC).
Disclosure
M.S. Carlino: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. A.M. Menzies: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. G.V. Long: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Array; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2108 - Biomarker analyses of ramucirumab in patients with platinum refractory urothelial cancer from RANGE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3090 - Comparison of Immuno-Oncology (IO) Biomarkers in Adenocarcinoma (ACB), Urothelial Carcinoma (UCB) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCCB) of the Bladder, with interim results from PURE01
Presenter: Daniele Raggi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5211 - Potential role of a clinical, taxonomical classification and RNA expression integrated signature to predict response to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients
Presenter: Albert Font
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3206 - Hyperphosphatemia due to Erdafitinib (a Pan-FGFR Inhibitor) and Anti-tumor Activity Among Patients (Pts) with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Scott Tagawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3110 - Prognostic role of FGFR Mutations and FGFR mRNA expression in metastatic urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD(L1) inhibitors in first and second line setting
Presenter: Florian Roghmann
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3564 - Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean-Michel Lavoie
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2760 - Comparative analysis of tumor mutational burden (TMB) prediction methods and its association with determinants of the tumor immune microenvironment of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC)
Presenter: Markus Eckstein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2513 - The Immunoscore in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical significance for pathological response and survival
Presenter: Elise Nassif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2835 - Genomic analysis of urothelial cancer and associations with treatment choice and outcome
Presenter: David Sarid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5763 - cfDNA is an acceptable but insufficient means of characterizing FGFR3 mutation in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)
Presenter: Sumanta Pal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract