Abstract 4598
Background
The majority of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receive non-targeted cytotoxic chemotherapy during their disease trajectory. Its use however near the end of life has not been extensively studied and it’s possible that patients with advanced disease may be exposed to unnecessary aggressive treatment.
Methods
Patients who were diagnosed with MBC in 2010-2015 were identified from the Stockholm-Gotland Breast Cancer Registry. Data regarding tumor characteristics, date of MBC diagnosis and death were collected from the registry. Data on chemotherapy use during the final month of the patient’s life, type of chemotherapy regimen used and albumin levels – a surrogate marker for performance status – were collected from individual patient files. Analysis of overall survival of the entire cohort was made in order to estimate contemporary survival of MBC patients.
Results
In total, 1571 patients were identified. Out of 1559 patients included in the survival analysis, there were 1357 deaths and 202 patients still alive. Chemotherapy during the last month of life was given to 23.2% of the patients, more commonly to patients ≤60 years old (35.6% versus 18.5%, p < 0.001). A new treatment regimen was initiated in 8.4% of patients. Both albumin (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92 – 0.98, p = 0.002) and age at the time of diagnosis (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 – 1.05, p < 0.001) predicted the administration of chemotherapy. The most commonly used chemotherapeutic was capecitabine (24.8%), followed by paclitaxel (14.6%) and vinorelbine (9.8%). After a median follow-up of 73.4 months, median overall survival in the entire cohort was 16.73 months (95% CI 15.22–18.24); patients ≤60 years-old had better median survival compared to older ones (24.83, 95% CI 20.61-29.05 versus 13.86 months, 95% CI 12.72-15.74; p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Chemotherapy use near the end of life was common, especially among younger patients. Median overall survival at the population level is considerably worse as compared to results from randomized trials. This may reflect on the differences in patient characteristics and completeness of registry data, which include patients that were never treated for MBC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J. Bergh: Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi-Aventis; Honoraria (self): UpToDate. T. Foukakis: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): UpToDate. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5612 - Evaluation of germ line mutational status among women with triple-negative breast cancer in Russia
Presenter: Elena Shagimardanova
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4142 - Association of derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) with pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT)
Presenter: Alberto Ocaña
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1733 - Competing nomogram for late-period breast cancer-specific death in patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
Presenter: Jianfei Fu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1978 - A Nomogram to Predict Pathologic Complete Response of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Based on Simple Blood Indicators
Presenter: Fanrong Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3062 - Identification of GSTP1 transferred by extracellular vesicles responsible for adriamycin-resistance in breast cancer cells
Presenter: Sujin Yang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5274 - Expression of X-linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein (XIAP) and its Association with Clinicopathological Parameters in Invasive Breast Cancers
Presenter: Gayathri Devi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1324 - The prognostic significance of preoperative tumor marker (CEA, CA15-3) elevation in breast cancer patients
Presenter: Soo Youn Bae
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4877 - Correlation of clinical and pathological features with the tumour microenvironment in DCIS. An institutional experience
Presenter: Ann Eapen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2471 - Correlation between radiologic complete response (rCR) in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer and pathologic complete response and their impact in recurrence-free survival
Presenter: Ariadna Gasol Cudos
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2632 - Ring-like uptake appearance on dedicated breast positron emission tomography before chemotherapy predicts outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
Presenter: Norio Masumoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract