Abstract 5271
Background
Clinical trials improve our knowledge of diseases and treatments while providing patients access to investigational agents. However, approximately 3% of newly diagnosed cancer patients are enrolled in clinical trials in the United States. Identifying an appropriate trial for a patient is time-consuming and cumbersome in the busy clinical practice. The Watson for Clinical Trial Matching (CTM) cognitive system uses AI to derive patient and cancer-related attributes from structured and unstructured text found in the electronic health record. These attributes are matched to complex eligibility criteria in clinical trial protocols.
Methods
In April 2019, a pilot study was launched to test the feasibility of implementing CTM in Gastrointestinal (GI) oncology at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Two clinical research coordinators (CRCs) screened patients for potential clinical trials prior to their clinic visits using both CTM and the traditional manual screening method. To avoid bias, each CRC screened a separate set of patients by both methods alternating which methodology was used first. The clinical trial match results were blinded to both CRCs. For each method, time to complete the screen and number of potential clinical trial matches were recorded.
Results
A total of 35 GI cancer patients with new diagnosis, recent resection or restaging scans were analyzed. Patients were evaluated against 50 GI-specific drug therapy and multi-disease phase I clinical trials. Clinical trial matching using CTM took an average of 10.1 minutes (Range: 4 to 20 min) per patient compared to an average of 30.5 minutes (Range: 5 to 75 min) per patient (p < 0.0001) using the manual method. CTM identified an average of 7.66 clinical trials (Range: 0-16) while the manual screening method identified an average of 1.97 clinical trials (Range: 0 to 6) per patient (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Implementation of Watson for CTM system with a CRC team may enable high volume patient screening for a large number of clinical trials in an efficient manner and promote awareness of clinical trial opportunities within the GI oncology practice. Further analysis to evaluate CTM accuracy and impact on enrollment is warranted and currently underway.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Mayo Clinic.
Disclosure
T. Haddad: Advisory / Consultancy: TerSera Therapeautics; Research grant / Funding (self): Takeda. S. Coverdill: Full / Part-time employment: IBM Watson Health; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: IBM. M. Rammage: Full / Part-time employment: IBM Watson Health; Licensing / Royalties: IBM. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract