Abstract 4743
Background
Canada has a publicly-funded healthcare system with a complex drug funding process. After Health Canada approval to market a drug, the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR) makes a non-binding funding recommendation to the Canadian provinces (except Quebec), which each then decide whether the drug will be publicly funded. We identified the determinants of funding in this process.
Methods
We analyzed drugs for advanced lung (n = 15), breast (n = 8), colorectal (CRC) (n = 7), melanoma (n = 10), and neuroendocrine (NET) (n = 3) cancer undergoing the funding decision process from 2011-2019. Determinants of funding assessed in the model included list price, cancer type, drug class, and pCODR recommendation. The primary outcome was the correlation between list price and time-to-funding (TTF: Health Canada approval to first provincial funding). Secondary outcomes included an exploratory analysis of predictors of drug funding.
Results
We analyzed 43 drugs: targeted agents 72%, immunotherapy 20%, chemotherapy 7%. 72% were funded in at least 1 province. Median TTF was 379 days (IQR 203-601). Median list price (28-day course) was $8213 (IQR 5391-9445). Higher list price was not correlated with TTF (correlation coefficient -0.20, p = 0.28). There was no association between list price and pCODR recommendation, or the decision to fund in at least 1 province. A positive pCODR recommendation correlated with the provinces’ funding decisions (p < 0.001), where 89% of drugs with a positive recommendation were funded and 100% of drugs with a negative recommendation were not funded. Tumour type was predictive of TTF (p < 0.001): CRC drugs slowest at a median of 2541 days (IQR 702-4379), and NET drugs quickest at a median of 0 days (IQR 0-502). Cancer type predicted decision to fund in at least 1 province (p = 0.005), with funding for 100% of NET drugs at the high end and 29% of CRC drugs at the low end. Drug class was predictive of TTF (p = 0.01): 465 days (IQR 245-702) for targeted agents, 443 days (IQR 298-587) for chemotherapy, and 339 days (IQR 164-446) for immunotherapy.
Conclusions
Determinants of drug funding include cancer type, drug class, and pCODR recommendation, but not list price. Factors other than cost are more heavily weighted in the funding decisions of cancer drugs in Canadian provinces.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Paul Wheatley-Price and Joanna Gotfrit.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2162 - Clinical Benefit and Prices of Cancer Drugs in the US and Europe
Presenter: Kerstin Vokinger
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
6081 - Biosimilar Substitution: European Prescriber Perspectives
Presenter: Michael Reilly
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
1218 - Cost avoided in drugs derived from participation in clinical trials in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Luis Sánchez- Rubio Ferrández
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
3453 - Accessibility and Affordability to Trastuzumab for Breast cancer patients: voices of the Global Oncology community from ONCOLLEGE 001 survey – part 2
Presenter: Sara Altuna
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
3302 - Poster Discussion - Public policy - Analysis of 105.000 cancer patients; have they been discussed in oncologic multidisciplinary team meetings? A nationwide population-based study in the Netherlands
Presenter: Janneke Walraven
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
5246 - Reaching sustainable oncology care via the National Cancer Control Program (NCCP)
Presenter: Branko Zakotnik
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
5586 - Changing landscape of clinical cancer trials in Germany
Presenter: Susen Burock
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
5192 - Comparison between phase III randomized clinical trials and their preceeding phase II studies.
Presenter: Ivan Lyra-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
5811 - Projecting overall survival data for health-economic models in oncology: do maturity levels impact uncertainty?
Presenter: Isabelle Borget
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
1801 - Implementation Frameworks to effectively transition complex research interventions into clinical practice in Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; A scoping Systematic Review
Presenter: Gayathri Delanerolle
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract