Abstract 3453
Background
ONCOLLEGE-001 project surveyed the global accessibility (ACC)/ affordability (AFF) to HER2-testing (H2T) & medicines for breast cancer (BC). The 1st analysis showed critical issues of ACC & AFF of H2T in lower- middle income countries. Part 2 of the survey focuses on ACC, AFF and prioritization of anti-HER2 medicines; here, we present the data for trastuzumab (T).
Methods
An internet-based survey was developed by the international ONCOLLEGE working group. Data were analyzed per country-income (World Bank groupings) and World Health Organization Regions. Responders authorized for the use of the data.
Results
Responses were received from 210 providers (78% medical or clinical oncologists) across 45 countries (all income groups, all regions). 8% of providers reported no T available in their setting, of which 60% are from low and low-middle income countries (LMICs) and the remaining from upper- middle (UMIC). Where T was available, 15% of the responders reported ACC only as out of pocket expenditure (OOP) for patients, of which almost 70% from LMICs. More than 2/3 of the responders described to order the H2T regardless ACC to affordable trastuzumab for patients, retaining the prognostic information of HER2- overexpression to inform treatment decision- making (e.g. risk grouping for early breast cancer). The patterns of reimbursement for T influenced the percentage of eligible HER2 patients receiving the anti-HER2 drug: T is received in more than 50% of the eligible population in 8%, 41% and 74% in LMIC, UMIC and HIC (high- income) settings, respectively. In 71% of settings where trastuzumab is provided only as OOP, <1/4 of the eligible patients could access affordable T.
Conclusions
The heterogeneous pattern of ACC and AFF of H2T & anti-HER2 medicines influenced the chance of breast cancer patients to receive T. Data on the use of trastuzumab biosimilars and other HER2 blockers is under analysis. International systematized cross-cutting and comprehensive efforts across the cancer continuum are warranted to inform and shape the areas of research implementation for cancer - aiming to optimize the cure and care for all cancer patients and prevent catastrophic OOP.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2162 - Clinical Benefit and Prices of Cancer Drugs in the US and Europe
Presenter: Kerstin Vokinger
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
4743 - Determinants of the Cancer Drug Funding Process in Canada
Presenter: Joanna Gotfrit
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
6081 - Biosimilar Substitution: European Prescriber Perspectives
Presenter: Michael Reilly
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
1218 - Cost avoided in drugs derived from participation in clinical trials in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Luis Sánchez- Rubio Ferrández
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
3302 - Poster Discussion - Public policy - Analysis of 105.000 cancer patients; have they been discussed in oncologic multidisciplinary team meetings? A nationwide population-based study in the Netherlands
Presenter: Janneke Walraven
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
5246 - Reaching sustainable oncology care via the National Cancer Control Program (NCCP)
Presenter: Branko Zakotnik
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
5586 - Changing landscape of clinical cancer trials in Germany
Presenter: Susen Burock
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
5192 - Comparison between phase III randomized clinical trials and their preceeding phase II studies.
Presenter: Ivan Lyra-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
5811 - Projecting overall survival data for health-economic models in oncology: do maturity levels impact uncertainty?
Presenter: Isabelle Borget
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
1801 - Implementation Frameworks to effectively transition complex research interventions into clinical practice in Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; A scoping Systematic Review
Presenter: Gayathri Delanerolle
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract